Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > Studio Lighting, Flash & Other

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Oct 26, 2004, 7:17 AM   #11
NHL
Senior Member
 
NHL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 39.18776, -77.311353333333
Posts: 11,547
Default

It's not so much the 'wrong lighting', but the 'wrong placement'!

-> if you side light a subject, the shadow will 'magnify' the impecfections of the skin
Not that this technique can not be put to good use in other places like accentuating a cleavage or waist line :-):-):-)
NHL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2004, 2:39 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
marokero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 769
Default

For available light, how about something on the cheap? A white bed sheet taped to cover a sun bathed window provides an on-the spot soft-box Learned that tip from Joe McNally
marokero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2004, 6:58 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
aladyforty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 6,964
Default

some good Ideas, thanks
aladyforty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 27, 2004, 12:05 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 171
Default

Lots of good info here already for you to research. I would just add, in answer to your original question, there are two basic things that affect flattering/unflattering images as you describe it. One, already mentioned, is light 'placement'. This generally is considered to mean the actual physical location of each light (main 45degress to one side, fill near camera axis, etc).

The other consideration is light source/size and deals with the quality of the light. This is changed by diffusing it thereby making it softer and more wrap-around with a softbox or diffusion panels. Or bouncing it off an umbrella, etc. So if you were trying to accentuate the facial lines - say for a character portrait of an old man, you could still use similar placement, but adjust the soft/hard value of the light with less or no diffusion (in other words, use a harsh light). Placement could also factor into this. There are many variables in all this - a good book on portrait lighting would be invaluable and have diagrams of light setup as examples.
flint350 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 6, 2004, 2:54 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 209
Default

A softbox is best. Use a big softbox as your main, and a smaller (or maybe an umbrella) as your fill. I have also triedlighting through a white umbrella as a fill. Or for a dramatic effect, don't use a fill. Maybe just a relector.
LTBerry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 8, 2004, 11:16 AM   #16
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 171
Default

I don't necessarily agree that a softbox is best. Diffusion panels are far more flexible and give at least as good a result and better. This is bcz you can move both the panel and the light separately for different effects. With the softbox, you have to move the whole thing (light and box) as a unit only. Plus, diffusion panels are cheaper, larger and easy to make. Pretty tough to make a decent softbox on your own. As you can tell, I'm a diffusion panel believer, though I do have and still use a softbox on my fill.
flint350 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 PM.