|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 23, 2008, 8:28 AM
|
#21 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 129
|
i definately recommend shooting RAW, i have been shooting RAW since about 2000 shots on my camera. You can recover a lot more pictures, and it doesnt slow down my xt until i shoot about 9 shots in a row at 3fps
you can remake colors exactly as you saw them except my 70-200 f4 L does most of that, but just being able to set white balance afterwards and under or over exposure correction is awesome! |
|
|
|
May 24, 2008, 1:58 PM
|
#22 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,974
|
Nothing to debate. Both are available with dSLR cameras. The choice made by the user is for their own needs or what PP programs they may or may not have.
RAW in my case is a waste of time. I see nothing to debate. |
|
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:58 PM.
