Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > Tips & Tricks

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 17, 2013, 12:14 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 263
Default Direct sun exposure

Can some one help explain how this photo is possible? Any time I have direct sunlight like that, the sky is blown out. Seems crazy to have such a perfect sunburst and a well exposed ground area as well. Filter? Exposure bracketing?


http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7284/8...98e68f42_b.jpg
sumx4182 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old May 17, 2013, 7:05 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
TCav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,543
Default

Metering systems do pretty well with reflected light, but direct light confuses them. Shots like this are difficult to meter correctly.

One way to do it is to put your finger in front of the lens, blocking the Sun, lock the exposure, remove your finger and take the shot.

Another is to use spot or center-weighted metering, and keep the Sun out of the metering area. This should do ok, unless there's a lot of flare that will get metered too.
__________________
  • The lens is the thing.
  • 'Full Frame' is the new 'Medium Format'.
  • "One good test is worth a thousand expert opinions." - Tex Johnston, Boeing 707 test pilot.
TCav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 17, 2013, 9:26 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 263
Default

Correct me if I'm wrong, but blocking out the sun would expose well for the landscape area but shouldn't it blow out the sky when you remove your hand? Somehow there's such a nice blue sky, sunburst, and a good landscape exposure all at the same time.
sumx4182 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2013, 6:36 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
TCav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,543
Default

The white sidewalk, green lawn and blue sky dominate the exposure of the image, to the point that all the distant buildings are underexposed. When you lock the exposure, removing your finger won't change the exposure settings, so the Sun will be greatly overexposed, but nothing else will change.

If you have an AE-L button or the like, the exposure settings will lock, so you can make changes to the composition while still using the settings you locked.

Another possibility that just occurred to me is that the exposure could be locked when the lens was zoomed in, excluding the Sun from the composition, and then zoomed out to include the Sun when the shutter button was pressed.
__________________
  • The lens is the thing.
  • 'Full Frame' is the new 'Medium Format'.
  • "One good test is worth a thousand expert opinions." - Tex Johnston, Boeing 707 test pilot.
TCav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2013, 10:04 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
VTphotog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Extreme Northeastern Vermont, USA
Posts: 4,214
Default

I believe your guess about exposure bracketing was pretty close. This was likely done with multiple exposures, combined to HDR, or using in-camera tone mapping. Note the 'halos' around the trees in the b/g, typical of a tone - mapped photo. The darkness of the blue in the left side of the shot also makes it appear that a polarizing filter was used.

brian
VTphotog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 18, 2013, 12:56 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
TCav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,543
Default

I think that tone mapping or HDR would have brightened the buildings in the distance. That is not to say that they wouldn't do a good job, possibly better than the example provided.
__________________
  • The lens is the thing.
  • 'Full Frame' is the new 'Medium Format'.
  • "One good test is worth a thousand expert opinions." - Tex Johnston, Boeing 707 test pilot.
TCav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2013, 4:40 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia, New South Wales central coast
Posts: 2,891
Default

G'day all

Sorry fellas - I don't think that any 'magic' was used at all
From the severe curvature of the LHS post, it's obvious to me that an extreme wide-angle lens was used

With the camera preset to centre-weighted metering / focussing the 'pack-of-cards' building & pathway & grass would get the most metering - leaving the sun out of the equation. This style of sun / starburst is very common with ultra w/a lenses once f11 - f22 are selected

Hope this helps a bit
Phil
__________________
Has Fuji & Lumix superzoom cameras and loves their amazing capabilities
Spends 8-9 months each year travelling Australia
Recent images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/ozzie_traveller/sets/
Ozzie_Traveller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 19, 2013, 8:21 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 263
Default

I know which lens was used. It was a Samyang/Bower 8mm fish-eye...I was just curious because with the same lens, my sky always blows out if the sun is directly into it.
sumx4182 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2013, 6:12 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
VTphotog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Extreme Northeastern Vermont, USA
Posts: 4,214
Default

As Phil mentions, the starburst effect indicates a very small aperture. Looking at the very dark sky in the upper right corner, and the way it grades, with pixelization to lighter colors, combined with the halo effect around the bare trees, indicates tone mapping and/or local contrast enhancement. I have produced the same effect myself when trying to recover details in severely underexposed parts of a shot. It can also happen with HDR when your exposure intervals are too wide.

brian
VTphotog is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 AM.