Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > Tips & Tricks

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 12, 2005, 5:51 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5
Default

Hi All,

Could someone pleasehelp me determine why my shots turned out so poorly?

Here's my settings: Nikon Coolpix 995, focal length 25mm (119mm), F/8, Shutter 1/500s, Exp comp -0.3, ISO 100, Metering mode: Pattern, Focus: INF.

Misc: altitude ~700', shotthrough open window, camera not in slipstream, not bracing against aircraft, taken at 4pm in Eastern Canada last week, overcast sky.

I set the exposure comp to slightly underexpose in the hopes I could bring out detail in photoshop afterwards.

Any idea why the image is blury and why the tone or contrast is so blotchy? (I'm not sure how to describe this problem.)


Note: this is a 75% cropped image to meet the file size limitations.


Thanks in advance!!!!

Attached Images
 
Spud726 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Mar 12, 2005, 8:03 PM   #2
Moderator
 
calr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Beaverton, OR
Posts: 8,466
Default

I think your problem might be the infinite focus. The sharpest focus available on a lens is just short of infinity. If the Coolpix 995 has through the lens viewing (SLR) adjust the focus for the sharpest image. If you cannot view through the lens, adjust focus for infinity and then backoff slightly. Try two or three shots at different focus settings to determine what the sharpest point is.

Good luck,
Cal Rasmussen
calr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 12, 2005, 8:14 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5
Default

Hmm, I'll try that.

The 995 is a great point and shoot buthasa crude manual focus that steps from 30ft to INF in one step. I'll give auto focus a try. I set it to INF to prevent it from focusing on the wind, but once I was upin theairI found I could open the window without to much trouble. (except for the -10degC breeze comming in! Brrrrr...)

Thanks.
Spud726 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 12, 2005, 9:04 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indian Rocks Beach, FL
Posts: 4,036
Default

Both of your poles look like this. The sun is from the upper right with relatively short shadows to the lower left, so the shadow to the left of the pole isn't from the sun. My guess is that the plane was moving from right to left and you didn't pan. Or there was just vibration that showed up mostly to the left.

There might be a focus problem, but there seems to be some motion blur there as well.



slipe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 13, 2005, 9:35 AM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5
Default

Thanks Slipe!

I see what you're saying with that.I thought setting the shutter to be 1/500s would clear that up.

Here's what I may try next time:

1)a higher shutterspeed like 1/1000s

2) a multi shot sequence (the 995 can take multiple shots andkeep the best based on file size)

3) work on my camera stabilization, currently I am holding the window open with one hand and the camera with the other. I was thinking of making a stick that I can prop the window open with to free upmy other hand to stabilize myself better.

4) set focus to manual

Any thoughts or other suggestions / experiences with aerial work?
Spud726 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 13, 2005, 9:56 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indian Rocks Beach, FL
Posts: 4,036
Default

I was wondering how the best shot mode works. I suppose a clear shot compresses better. I don't have it so I can't comment on whether it is better than just using a burst mode and deciding for yourself. Camera shake and vibration vary from moment to moment and a burst can get a clear shot out of a group. I doubt that applies to a constant prop vibration and aircraft movement.

Don't let the camera touch any part of the airplane. Your body is the best vibration damper on the plane.

Pan even with high shutter speed flying that low. Especially if you can't generate 1/1000 second. If a plane flies over low and you hold the camera still and shoot at 1/500 you will likely get some motion blur. Pan with the plane and you will likely get a sharp shot. It is exactly the same from the plane to the ground with the same movement.

slipe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 13, 2005, 10:29 AM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5
Default

I haven't used it much but if you compare a blurred image with a sharp one (given the same res and settings etc..) the blurred one will have a lower file size. It has to do with the way jpeg compression works. However, that doesn't mean that the picture was composed better.

Looking at the file sizes from the set taken that day, they all seem pretty close in size: the smallest was 608k, largest 746k. These were of different scenes so the differencemostly comes frome that. But, the BSS must be comparing files of very similar sizes, so I cannot imagine it works perfectly every time unless the blur is considerable.

I see your point about panning and will add that to my checklist for the next trip.

Thanks again.
Spud726 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 14, 2005, 7:32 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
BillDrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hay River Township, WI
Posts: 2,512
Default

You can do some tests for motion blur (not shake) by standing at the right distance from a freeway. If the ground speed of the plane was 140mph and distance was 500 ft, you will get the same blur in cars moving at 70mph shooting at 250 ft. Shoot off a tripod so motion blur is the only issue. You can also try hand-held panning to get rid of that blur - should be good practice.
BillDrew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 15, 2005, 10:10 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
sjms's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 2,735
Default

shooting with one hand isn't going to hack it. if you are there to shoot you need to make it so the opening is clear and both your hands are on the camera. do not brace yourself on any portion of the aircraft. them thar bug smasher things (prop jobs)vibrate like all heck
sjms is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 4, 2005, 3:42 PM   #10
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 5
Default

Follow up...

I just got another trip in with much better results.I was able touse both handsby proping the window open with a stick and suction cup jig. Also, I recently bought a new camera (Rebel XT) which allows a higher iso and so I was using 1/1000s shutter which maybe helped a bit.

I'd say, the improvement was owing mostly to the window jig.

Thanks all!
Spud726 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:14 AM.