Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Feb 7, 2010, 10:36 PM   #1
Senior Member
John.Pattullo's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 613
Default anyon used the manfrotto 393 gimbal head?

jsut wondering if its any good for the likes of my sigma 150-500

dont need any special head for the lens because of its weight but tracking movinganimals or flying birds etc i want something easier than a ballhead
Pentax-DA 12-24mm f4 | Pentax-DA* 16-50mm f2.8 | Pentax-A 50mm f1.4 | Tamron 90mm f2.8 Macro | Pentax-DA* 60-250mm f4 | Sigma 150-500mm
Pentax Photo Gallery
John.Pattullo is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Mar 5, 2010, 8:19 AM   #2
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 69

This is a replacement for the Manfrotto 3421 which is still available, don't know if there is a difference, they look the same in pictures. I just bought a 3421 after a strong recommendation from a professional wildlife photographer who uses it for his pro level Nikon with a huge 600 mm. lens. It is well suited for tracking birds. See the user reviews of the 3421 on Amazon.

Last edited by ropp; Mar 5, 2010 at 8:22 AM.
ropp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 5, 2010, 11:09 AM   #3
Senior Member
pbjunkiee's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pensacola Fl
Posts: 914

i have the manfratto 560b-1

well worth its weight in gold
pbjunkiee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2010, 4:55 PM   #4
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 69

Just noticed that my new Manfrotto head actually is a 393. It does appear identical to the 3421 model, which has user reviews on Amazon.
ropp is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 7:14 AM.