Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jun 13, 2006, 10:18 AM   #41
Senior Member
tmoreau's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 477

You compare them to manfrotto 3021, do you own the manfrottos or are you comparing based on pictures? I'm more curious about the actual sturdiness in use than design in general. Are there any specific shortcomings that may indicate why the price is so low?
tmoreau is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 13, 2006, 10:52 AM   #42
Senior Member
DougJGreen's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 198

I've used the Manfrotto 3021 in the past, as it was owned by a studio I worked with. Essentially, there is no difference between it and the AT-858 leg set. The price of the Amvonas is low because they are made in China, by cheap labor, and they have minimal R&D, being copies, and minimal marketing expense, selling online without any advertising in major media.

The main cost differential is that it costs alot less to copy than to innovate and design something functional from scratch. Essentially, it's an excellent copy, that works the same as the original that it was copied from. Copies are always alot cheaper than originals. Sometimes, they work just as well, and this is one of those times.
DougJGreen is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 3:43 PM.