Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > Tripods and Heads

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Dec 23, 2011, 3:36 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Wingman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hebron, Kentucky (northern Kentucky/Greater Cincinnati):KCVG
Posts: 4,320
Default Flashpoint Gimball Head???

Anyone have a Flashpoint Gimball type head? They are priced considerably less than others on the market (Wembly, Jobu, etc). I have read some mixed reviews that say it is a good value, but that it lacks smoothness and fluidity in the operation. On the other hand, Pop. Photography rated it a best buy last year. I am looking to mount a Sigma 150-500 lens on it for use in aviation photography. Would like some accounts of user experience from anyone who owns or has used one.

Thanks!

Jehan
Wingman is online now   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Dec 26, 2011, 4:42 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Bob Nichol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Eastern Ontario Canada
Posts: 822
Default

What about the Manfrotto 393 for the Sigma 150-500mm. I have it mounted on a Manfrotto 681 monopod.
Bob Nichol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 26, 2011, 9:23 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Wingman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hebron, Kentucky (northern Kentucky/Greater Cincinnati):KCVG
Posts: 4,320
Default

Bob, I had looked at the Manfroto 393, but don't like the idea of the lens mount being above (i.e. the lens hanging from the mount). I'd much prefer that the weight of the lens and body rest on the foot of the mounting ring. For that same reason, I wouldn't get the gimball heads where the mount is on the side. I don'tknow for sure if there are any differences in stress points on the lens mounting foot when using an overhead or side mount.

Jehan
Wingman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 27, 2011, 7:18 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Bob Nichol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Eastern Ontario Canada
Posts: 822
Default

I use the 393 with the foot down and it works just as well.

The tripod foot on a big tele is on a ring to allow rotation of the camera and lens assembly not to mention when you carry it by holding the foot, either upright or up side down, so any stresses would have been anticipated by the engineers.
Bob Nichol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 27, 2011, 10:11 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Wingman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hebron, Kentucky (northern Kentucky/Greater Cincinnati):KCVG
Posts: 4,320
Default

Bob, I did not realize that the Manfrotto 393 could be used to mount the lens with the foot below the lens (vs. above). Watched some videos on Utube and this seems a versatile option. A couple of questions for you?

1. How's the motion (i.e. smooth, fluid vs stiff)?
2. How's the overall balance of the camera/lens when mounted?

Thanks for the suggestion!

Jehan
Wingman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 27, 2011, 10:32 AM   #6
Senior Member
 
Bob Nichol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Eastern Ontario Canada
Posts: 822
Default

There are wing nuts on the pivots so you can make it a tight as you want. The kit includes a quick release plate to attach to the lens foot. This plate slides back and forth on the 393 to balance the camera/lens assembly to your taste. Once balanced you can lock it in place.
Bob Nichol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 27, 2011, 10:56 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
Bob Nichol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Eastern Ontario Canada
Posts: 822
Default

QR plate attached to the tripod foot on the lens.

View of 393 showing wing nuts and QR plate base.

Sigma 150-500mm attached to 393. There is a safety catch to prevent the QR plate from sliding out of the base.
Attached Images
   

Last edited by Bob Nichol; Dec 27, 2011 at 10:58 AM.
Bob Nichol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 27, 2011, 11:11 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
Wingman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hebron, Kentucky (northern Kentucky/Greater Cincinnati):KCVG
Posts: 4,320
Default

Thanks Bob...you went to some trouble there to take some pictures of the set up! Will be looking at this instead of the Flashpoint. The reviews are largely very positive for the 393.

Thanks again! Jehan
Wingman is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 27, 2011, 2:51 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Bob Nichol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Eastern Ontario Canada
Posts: 822
Default

No trouble at all.
Bob Nichol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 27, 2011, 5:00 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Wingman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hebron, Kentucky (northern Kentucky/Greater Cincinnati):KCVG
Posts: 4,320
Default

One last question Bob...does this come witht a QR plate or do I need to purchase one separately. The listings don't exactly say so.
Wingman is online now   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:52 AM.