|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
|
![]()
poppop-
Here is another S-6000 review that I stumbled upon: http://www.photoxels.com/fujifilm-s6000fd-review.html Good shopping! MT/Sarah |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 34
|
![]()
Thanks for the link to the review! I hadn't seen that site before. Good slide show of S6000fd pix. The S9100 is the update to the S9000, and I haven't seen more than about 1-2 reviews on it. Any idea why there aren't more reviews on the S9100 out there?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
|
![]()
Poppop-
I am not positive, but I believe that the lack of reviews is because the S0100 is fairly new. MT/Sarah |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 4
|
![]()
The CCD sensor size of S9100 is actuallyVERY big, comparing to others such as the new Canon G7 or the much praised Canon S3.
Canon G7 - 1/1.8 inch, 10MB, CCD Canon S3 - 1/2.5 inch, 6MB, CCD Fuji S9100 - 1/1.6 inch, 9MB, Super CCD HR Fuji S600fd - 1/1.7 inch, 6MB, Super CCD HR Olympus SP-510 UZ - 1/2.5 inch, 7MB, CCD Super CCD HR is claimed to double effective pixels of regular CCD. Even if not, it is still bigger than comparable Canon's. In fact S9100 has the BIGGEST sensor in non SLR superzoomer cameras. Fafa |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Israel
Posts: 369
|
![]()
AFAIK Sony R1 has the BIGGEST sensor in non SLR superzoomer cameras (21.5 x 14.4mm APS-C sensor). OK, it's not a superzoom, but it's not a DSLR either:-)
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|