Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Oct 25, 2006, 10:19 AM   #1
Junior Member
nikk1e's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1

Hi all,

I need to get a sub £200 camera for my girlfriend.


7Mpx or more | 3x Optical | Anti-shake technology | AA batteries prefered | and it has to look pretty :roll:

Typical usage:

Pictures of Niece/Nephew | Pictures of friends partying in nightclubs

Thanks in Advance!


p.s so far I'm thinking of getting the CASIO Exilim Zoom EX-Z700

nikk1e is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Oct 28, 2006, 5:44 PM   #2
Senior Member
kenbalbari's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 822

The Casio ultracompacts are popular for being very slim, convenient, stylish, user friendly and quick. They may be the most popular brand for a really slim ultracompact, but they do suffer some in image quality, especially indoors (flash required).

For the types of pictures you are lalking about, I think you would get best results from the Fuji F20:

It's not quite as compact or as stylish as the Casio, but will give better image quality than anything else in that price range, particularly for those indoor & social type shots.

I'd also look at the Panasonic Lumix Fx01, available online for about $220 shipped (US):

That's probably as good as you will do for a camera with true IS at that price. It's very good outdoors. Photos get a bit grainy at higher ISOs, but with the IS, you will still do pretty well indoors (I think better than the Casio anyway). I'm not sure, but it may also be available in some cute colors like the Casio (I know some Lumix models are).

None of the above has AA batteries. No camera that small will. AA batteries are really too big and not enough power for these cameras. The Lithium-ion rechargeables are really more suitable for a pocket sized camera. For a bigger camera, too large for a pants pocket, you can find AA batteries used, and often a few more features for the same price as well. An example would be the Canon A630:


kenbalbari is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Oct 30, 2006, 5:09 PM   #3
Senior Member
KALEL33's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 260

You would have more options if you dropped the Megapixels. Are you planning on taking pics larger than 16x20? A 4MP will do just as good with 8x10s and below unless you are cropping alot. A high MP count on a cheap and small sensor will give you subpar pics compared to lower MP cameras.
KALEL33 is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 9:21 AM.