|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 589
|
![]()
The W5 I've tried.. It did HORRIBLY in low light.. That's an understatement actually. My 3 yr old Sony P71 did a better job..lol.
The 610.. I'm not totally sure.. I tried the camera for a few weeks.. I played initially with it.. All I remember was it was clearer than the W5. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 276
|
![]()
In My opinion, the Fuji F10 will give you the image and build quality your looking for with low light capability. I also just did a comparison on a video I took with my F10 indoors and steve's indoor video, and they both had a little grain, and little to no noticable compression artifacts. Both 640x480 30FPS MJPEG. However, the F10 can hold 15 minutes on a 1GB chip at maximum quality, while the A610 could hold 10 minutes. The only advantage of the A610 IMO is aperture and shutter priority, cheaper cards, and a lens that has slighly more zoom with a faster F-stop.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 589
|
![]()
Here's an example of the S2 video (mind the loud engines..lol)
http://files.blog-city.com/files/M04...s2feb5_136.avi |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 589
|
![]()
Oh.. and a terribly compressed verison of another shot.
note: you can zoom in video mode with the S2 http://www.onetruemedia.com/shared?p...9651d959ea77a1 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indian Rocks Beach, FL
Posts: 4,036
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|