|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 92
|
![]()
I have come in this afternoon with lots of insect photos that looked in focus on the screen of my compact. Unfortunately most were out of focus by a greater or lesser degree. The camera autofocus just can't cope with tiny objects and manual focus depends on the lcd screen (all of today's seemed to be in focus when taken). I have been thinking of getting a dslr with a proper macro lens for this photography for a while and today is the final straw although the camera is superb everywhere else.
I'm not new to SLR's having had film SLR's since the 1970's so I know what they can do, but my question from those of you familiar with the current crop of DSLR's is which body will be the best for hand held natural light shots of insects (and it can be pretty dull at times here in the UK). I can read the specs but they are no substitute for actual use. Factors such as start up, shot to shot time, autofocus on small objects & it's speed, viewfinder quality in respect to focussing (do they still do split screens?), high iso noise, antishake?. The candidates to chose from are: Pentax *istDL (the DS now being discontinued), Oly E300, Nikon D50, KM Dynax 5D, Canon EOS 350D. Your views will be gratefully accepted ![]() I know someone will say that it's the system or the photographer that's important, but it's the body that I need to choose, I will stay the same and they all make decent (enough for me) macro lenses. Here is an example, it's Tachina grossa, the largest fly in Europe at 2cm (and probably the ugliest). As usual, it looked in focus on the lcd screen and that was one of the better ones: ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 92
|
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 76
|
![]()
While I love my ist ds (its still avaible and cheap) some of the big third party lense man. only make some of their macro lenses for canon and nikon. The tokina 180 macro is an example. So, for the widest choice of lenses go with the d50 or the 350d.
Just see wich one feels better, they both perform rather well. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 326
|
![]()
You do not give any set ups of your shots. Its not an auto focus problem that you have but a DOF problem. Looking at the shot the root of the wing is in focus, so the camera must have focussed on that. Give the details and calculate the DOF. I bet its only about 2mm.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 92
|
![]()
amicah22, thanks for your reply, I see your point about the lenses.
Geriatric, It was manually focussed as the camera's autofocus doesn't work too well on small subjects. You are right about the narrow depth of field, but it's impossible to define on the lcd screen if it is focussed on the head or wing root, just the position where it appears to be best. Here is the EXIF data: Model : PENTAX Optio 750Z Sub Information ExposureTime : 1/320Sec FNumber : F4.6 ISOSpeedRatings : 200 ExposureBiasValue : EV0.0 MeteringMode : Division Flash : Not fired(Compulsory) FocalLength : 39.00(mm) ColorSpace : sRGB ExposureMode : Auto WhiteBalance : Auto DigitalZoomRatio : 100/100 FocalLength(35mm) : 187(mm) SceneCaptureType : Standard Contrast : Normal Saturation : High Sharpness : Normal SubjectDistanceRange : Close view Quality mode : S.Fine ISO Sensivity : 200 White Balance : Auto Focal Length : 39(mm) Saturation : +1 Contrast : Normal Sharpness : Normal |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 326
|
![]()
At f4.6 and 39mm focal length the DOF at half size is only 4.14mm. You should increase the aperture to the smallest you can use.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|