|
|||||||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Sep 5, 2006, 2:14 AM
|
#1 |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 31
|
I'm sure there's already been comparisons but I was just curious of the major differences of the 2?...The 2.5" LCD as well as being 10 megapixel are the only BIG factors I have noticed. Is there anything else I'm missing? Also what is the difference between the Sony Alpha's anti-dust system & the XTi's? Thx in advance...
|
|
|
| Sponsored Links |
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2006, 12:19 PM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,423
|
Main difference is the AF unit in 400D. It's got 9 point AF system from 30D.
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2006, 12:45 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 31
|
bobbyz wrote:
Quote:
Appreciate the help....I'm somewhat new to this so what exactly is the benefits of a 9 point auto focus system and how many points was the XT? |
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 5, 2006, 9:30 PM
|
#4 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 150
|
AF of 350D is not really accurate and has big problems while foccusing with lenses, faster than F2,8 (because of their shallow DOF).
|
|
|
|
|
Sep 6, 2006, 11:57 AM
|
#5 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,423
|
Xt had 7 point AF. I wasn't bad in a sense but just that 9 point system in 30D is better. Now new 400D gets the same system. This new system has central cross-sensor which is more accurate with lenses of f2.8 or wider.
also buffer has been improved alot in new 400d. It used to be 4 RAW files not it is alomst same as 30D with 10 files and 27 jpegs. |
|
|
|
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 1:04 AM.
