Steve'sDigicams

pens92 · Feb 3, 2006, 7:35 PM

I'm going to buy a slr camera very soon I am going to shoot mainly sports football and volleyball and vacation stuff how much better is the 20d compared to the rebel xt and is it worth the extra $350 to buy it??? I plan on keeping this camera for awhile and don't want to have to upgrade in the near future.Thanks in advance.

jacks · Feb 3, 2006, 8:32 PM

Both are excellent cameras.
If a camera is excellent now, it will still be excellent in 10 years. I don't understand this 'have to have the latest and greatest' upgrade nonsense.
For shooting sport the 20D takes 5 pics/second which is better than the 350's 3, and it also has a high precision auto-focus spot if you have a fast enough lens. It's also bigger, which may or may not be good depending on your hands and is a little bit better built.
Picture quality is near identical.
All in all, the 20D is a little bit better than the 350, but if you put the $350 difference into a better lens then the 350 could be much better for you.
The 350 with a Sigma 70-200f2.8 would be far, far better for sport than a 20D with a 70-300f4-5.6 for example though the price would be similar.
It all depends on how much you want to spend.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Steve'sDigicams

Recent Camera Reviews

Most Active Forums

Most Popular Deals

Latest Feature Articles

Feb 3, 2006, 7:35 PM	#1
pens92 Junior Member Join Date: Feb 2006 Posts: 2	I'm going to buy a slr camera very soon I am going to shoot mainly sports football and volleyball and vacation stuff how much better is the 20d compared to the rebel xt and is it worth the extra $350 to buy it??? I plan on keeping this camera for awhile and don't want to have to upgrade in the near future.Thanks in advance.

Feb 3, 2006, 8:32 PM	#2
jacks Senior Member Join Date: May 2005 Posts: 221	Both are excellent cameras. If a camera is excellent now, it will still be excellent in 10 years. I don't understand this 'have to have the latest and greatest' upgrade nonsense. For shooting sport the 20D takes 5 pics/second which is better than the 350's 3, and it also has a high precision auto-focus spot if you have a fast enough lens. It's also bigger, which may or may not be good depending on your hands and is a little bit better built. Picture quality is near identical. All in all, the 20D is a little bit better than the 350, but if you put the $350 difference into a better lens then the 350 could be much better for you. The 350 with a Sigma 70-200f2.8 would be far, far better for sport than a 20D with a 70-300f4-5.6 for example though the price would be similar. It all depends on how much you want to spend.