|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4
|
![]()
hi there,
am totally confused as to what dig camera i should go for the choice i have narrowed it down to: casio ex-z40 - good for size, big screen but have heard not good images, nikon coolpix 4200 - great camera, bit bigger, smaller screen, but i think gd photos, battery life is a bit dubious any adivce would be much appreciated Cheers Mike |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10
|
![]()
Having bought the Z40 if you like your pictures crisp & sharp DONT NOT buy this camera. The Nikon however I have heard is nice picture quality...between the two I would go for the Nikon
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4
|
![]()
thanks for the advice, i agree i think the nikon by name is better for images but i usually only get 5x7 pics so im just questioning whether i would be able to tell the difference?
i think the casio is better for screen, menus, style & cradle, nikon bit bulkier, but lightweight - you usually know that photos are good quality?! its a strange old thing! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|