|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 29
|
![]()
I tried to post my detailed reasoning here but Steve's forum software gets rid of all the line breaks and is too hard to use. Go visit this link:http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1012&thread=15967069 to see my reasoning if you're looking at the E900 and are curious about a similar voyager...Steve, I really dont like the forum software. The search also does not work well.Keep up with the great reviews, just change forum software.Cheers,-Walter
|
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
|
![]()
pub/Walter-
With all due respects, your post was garbled and only very marginally readable. I assume that you ae indeed speaking about the Fuji S-9000. I own the Fuji S-9000, and will tell you quite honestly that the Fuji S-9000 is something of a weird turkey. I would cautaion any folks that might be interested in the Fuji S-9000 to be very careful indeed. It is certainly not what itwe have been led to believe the Fuji S-9000 really is. It is nothing more than a small imager with too many pixels thrust upon it. The result is IMHO very sloppy, with less than great photos. MT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
|
![]()
pub/Walter-
With all due respects, your post was garbled and only very marginally readable. I assume that you ae indeed speaking about the Fuji S-9000. I own the Fuji S-9000, and will tell you quite honestly that the Fuji S-9000 is something of a weird turkey. I would cautaion any folks that might be interested in the Fuji S-9000 to be very careful indeed. It is certainly not what itwe have been led to believe the Fuji S-9000 really is. It is nothing more than a small imager with too many pixels thrust upon it. The result is IMHO very sloppy, with less than great photos. Buyer beware! MT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 29
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 29
|
![]()
Yes, what I posted lost all of its formatting and was quite garbled. Very strange and frustrating. I do not like the bulletinboard/forum Steve uses. It relies heavily on JavaScript and glitches. I tried several times to get it to come out properly. However, if you are interested in reading it, check it out on my blog where it formats perfectly well: http://SugarMtnFarm.com/blog/
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|