|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,540
|
![]()
Hey, nothing wrong with the Canon A-series.
I've recommended those cams to several relatives. Yah, I wouldn't say Lithium or AA is the deal breaker. Ultimately, I'd buy the camera I was interested in - regardless of the battery source. Here is a post containing photos that a friend of mine's son took at 13 years of age: http://forums.steves-digicams.com/fo...15&forum_id=90 Perhaps if your interested you could post some of your daughter's photos for comments by the pro's. It's kind of fun seeing how young people view the world through a viewfinder - and realize that they are the photographers of the future! |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Chester, UK
Posts: 2,980
|
![]()
On the AA battery issue....
The problem with ordinary alkaline AAs is their high internal resistance, so although the stored capacity may be high relative to Ni-MH rechargeables, their voltage may drop a lot, just temporarily for the time when actually drawing a lot of current,e.g., running motors for zooming and focusing, recharging flashguns quickly. Also, as emergency spares when you can't use a charger, lithium 1.5V disposable (primary) AA cells are worth thinking about for cameras that take AA cells. These have very high capacity - I saw an advert for 2900mAh ones, so 2 or 4 of those in a digicam should last a long time. They are expensive, however. Some cameras may also take primary Li or secondary rechargeable lithium-ion CR-V3 batteries, if they'll fit the compartment (physically, and with correct polarity) substituting for pairs of AAs. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|