rjseeney wrote: Quote:
I've never encountered a situation where I needed to shoot 1/8 exposures at 1600 iso in 15 years of shooting. These tests are just not real world situations. Real world you would be using a flash and a lower ISO.
Konica Minolta Maxxum 5D, ISO 3200, 28mm f/2 at f/2.5 (1/2 stop down from wide open), 1/6 second. No, it's not print quality, and yes I could have used a brighter lens. It's also a tad soft from motion blur and my focus was off.
But, for web size viewing, it works OK. They asked me not to use a flash there (I did once and they complained) I like to take snapshots while we eat out from time to time, and the ability to use higher ISO speeds comes in handy for that purpose.
Instead of a Piano Player at the bar, they sometimes have a small band on one side of the dining area, too.
Every once in a while, the light gets to be pretty good, thanks to a tiny lights clipped on to the music stands in front of the performers, so I'll manage to squeeze off some with the 100mm f/2 at much faster shutter speed. :-)
Minolta 100mm f/2, wide open at f/2, ISO 3200, hand held at 1/20 second. Straight from the camera jpeg with no Post Processing except for rotation and downsizing. Yes, it's a tad soft, too.. But, the higher ISO speed capability allows me to capture memories that I couldn't get otherwise.
I'm in Linux right this minute.
But, I'll probably boot back into my Windows partition later. I've got some photos of a guitar player from another restaurant I can try to find, where I needed to underexpose slightly to get my shutter speeds up to 1/8 to 1/10 second at f/2 and ISO 3200.