Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Aug 3, 2006, 2:14 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 26
Default

I'm looking for a camera recommendation. I currently have a Canon A95 (5 MP) I've been using over 2 1/2 years and about 8000 shots. It being my first digital camera I'm thinking of an upgrade and giving the A95 to my wife. My needs roughly are;
    Your input will be appreciated.
    yawglenn is offline   Reply With Quote
    Sponsored Links
    Old Aug 3, 2006, 2:56 PM   #2
    Senior Member
     
    mtclimber's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Oct 2005
    Location: Oregon, USA
    Posts: 18,143
    Default

    yawglenn-

    Because the Fuji S-600fd will not be available until next month, we will have to wait a bit. However, by looking at the excellent F-30 images at high ISO settings we can already see some of the potential. That potential looks quite large, and ever so useful.

    IMHO, I would wait for the S-6000.

    MT
    mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old Aug 4, 2006, 2:23 AM   #3
    Senior Member
     
    Join Date: Aug 2006
    Posts: 822
    Default

    Check out the test shots here:
    http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/canona95/page7.asp
    http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilmf30/page13.asp

    To my eyes the F30 looks better at 1600 ISO than the A95 did at 400. I think some of that is from heavier noise reduction; but I think the actual noise there is still about the same. There's certainly not any less detail in the F30 shot at 1600 ISO. Even the F30 shot at 3200 ISO isn't that different from the A95 at 400; but there you can see that there is clearly some loss of detail.

    And I think the F30 at 3200 is actually very comparable to the SD700 IS at 800.
    http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fujifilmf30/page12.asp

    Again, there's more noise reduction in the F30 image. But most of the top of the image looks comparable. It's only in the bottom of the image, where you can see some details in the F30 image being washed out in shadows (like the bottom third of the globe, or the bottom part of the Bailey's label), where I see less detail left after the noise reduction. But if the SD700 at 800 ISO is better than the F30 at 3200 ISO at all, it's by a hair.

    And don't only look at the crops of the above, click on the main image and get the full thing if you really want to compare.

    kenbalbari is offline   Reply With Quote
    Old Aug 6, 2006, 1:22 AM   #4
    Junior Member
     
    Join Date: May 2006
    Posts: 26
    Default


    Thanks mtclimber for your input, I think you're speaking of the FinePix s6500fd, well if it's in my price range it will be certiantly on my list of prospects judging from some reviews of other FinePix cameras. So I'll certainty be waiting for the reviews next month. The extra ISO will go a long way for my purposes.

    Also thanks kenbalbari for your links, very helpful.

    Well I hopped over to some local stores to handle some super-zoom cameras, namely the Fuji S5200, Canon PowerShot S3 IS and the Sony DSCH2 and so far I'm leaning towards to Fuji with the Canon as runner-up and the Sony is out. I like the Fuji's ISO and the Canon with a physical image stabilizer is a strong point. What I didn't like about the Sony besides its handling was the lack of a flippable view screen which is something I need.

    yawglenn is offline   Reply With Quote
    Reply


    Thread Tools Search this Thread
    Search this Thread:

    Advanced Search

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are On
    Pingbacks are On
    Refbacks are On



    All times are GMT -5. The time now is 6:15 AM.