|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 13
|
![]()
Dear Forum,
I am considering these two cameras. I want the one with the best image quality. The 100 is 14MP, and the 250 is 16MP. I thought I had run across something saying that lower MP cameras produce sharper images. Is this right? Thanks! Mike ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Bangor,North Wales
Posts: 3,766
|
![]()
Image quality comes down to so many factors- as does sharpness.
From sensor type,on board processing,quality of lens/glass....etc. Megapixel count is probably the least important- especially at the price point of these two Fuji's- and quite often can hinder image quality- if not slow the camera down with the extra processing necessary. However,possibly more significant is the fact that from what I can see,the 100 uses a CCD sensor and the 250 seems to use a CMOS type- generally considered to be better in lower light- and the CMOS equipped cameras always seem to perform faster also. The JZ250 http://digitalcameradayreview.com/fu...x-jz250-review and the 100 http://digitalcameradayreview.com/finepix-jz100-review ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 13
|
![]()
Thanks for your expert opinion, Simon! The review was quite positive. Thanks; I hadn't found that.
I think I will try it (the 250). I just have to find a good place to buy that allows free returns if I find I don't like it! Looks like B&H has the best price! Last edited by Cburg; Mar 30, 2012 at 6:49 PM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|