Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Oct 25, 2005, 8:41 PM   #1
dragonluvr's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 50

ok, here it is: I have held the camera's, played with them and like three of them.....of course all take great pictures, all have pro's and con's......I have listed three scenario's of what I am thinking of.....kind of comes down to a cost factor and whether the higher priced one is really worth it? opinions?

also, can someone point me to a site that does lens reviews? I am considering the Sigma 24-135mm F/2.8-4.5 lens or the Sigma 28-200mm one...I know that they aren't perfect and I'm not expecting it (with wide-zoom optical span), but I do like the ease of these walk around type lens.

ok, so on to what I have in mind:

Nikon D70s (899 body)
Nikon 50mm F/1.8 D (104)
Sigma 28-200mm (199)
Sigma 24-135mm (359)
Total: 1202 or 1362

Nikon D50 (650 body)
Nikon 50mm F/1.8 D (104)
Sigma 28-200mm (199)
Sigma 24-135mm (359)
Total: 953 or 1113

Canon 20D (1299 body)
EF 50mm f/1.8 II (80)
currentlyown aTamron 28-200mm (0)
total: 1379
100 rebate
new total: 1279

Now why I am asking is because I got some bday money that I can add to this and take the cost down a bit more, so that the difference between the Canon 20d and the Nikon D50 (with the 28-200 lens) is 326. Between the Nikon D70s it would be 77 dollars. Which would you chose, which package? like I said, I like them all. Is it worth the money to pay a bit more for the 20D?Is the d70s kit lens worth the extra 300?

Confused as always :?

dragonluvr is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:52 AM.