|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,870
|
![]()
Netscape 7.2...when I click on your link, I go to the orange-crush site - but when I click on one of the pic folders, I go to earthlink.net. I can only get to your pics when I use IE.
At any rate, I think you get my point about the blurred areas of some pics as opposed to totally blurred pics - or don't you? Regarding test results of noise in various cameras, here's another man's opinion: http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/fuji...000/page10.asp http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonicfz20/page7.asp http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/samsungpro815/page6.asp Open up two windows and compare the same area, say the gold helmet in both of the following pics: http://www.steves-digicams.com/2004_...s/p1010111.jpg http://www.steves-digicams.com/2005_...s/DSCF0701.JPG I agree with slipe regarding the F10 sensor vs. the S9000 sensor, but I disagree with the noise comparison between the S9000 and the FZ20. I think the Fuji ISO 800 shots are as good if not better than the pany ISO 400 shots - strictly from a noise perspective. I think the Pany pics are sharper than the Fuji. the Hun |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|