|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#11 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
|
![]()
slipe-
It is just my opinion, but I believe that the Fuji F-10 performs better in low light when compared to the Fuji S-5200. I was hoping that the performance would be equal or better, but it isn't. Currently I do not have any online storage of full resolution photos. MT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indian Rocks Beach, FL
Posts: 4,036
|
![]()
mtclimber wrote:
Quote:
The sensor on the S5200 is 24.7 sq mm and the F10 is 43.3 sq mm. That gives the F10 a lower density even though it is an Mp higher. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
|
![]()
slipe-
Thanks for the info. I believe that would probably account for the F-10's better low light level performance. You know there is a rumor afoot that Fuji is slated to announce the F-30 at PMA. It is based on the F-10 imager and the F-30 will be capable of using a max ISO speed of 3200. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
|
![]()
The kodak P-880 continues to amaze me. It is a very capable camera with many high lights. Today a Macro photo for you as I dashed out between rain showers to get the mail. I found a bumble bee hiding out in a daffodill to protect himself from the rain showers.
MT |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|