Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Dec 20, 2006, 3:02 PM   #1
Junior Member
Retnuhrace's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2

Ok, here's the deal. I'm a very novice camera user (when it comes to all of the advanced features of the camera). However, I've always had a passion for photography, so I'm looking to spend whatever holiday money I get this year on a new camera. My ultimate goal is to take amazing-looking up-close macro shots of wildlife, nature, and things of that sort. However, I also would like a camera that can take good pics of moving objects, for example at a football or baseball game.

Right now I have a good-ole P&S: a 5MP Canon Powershot A95. I feel that now is the time to upgrade. I've been researching cameras heavily for the past 3 days or so, and I am on the fence about whether to get a super-zoom or a D-SLR. I know that a super-zoom will ultimately be cheaper, but I know that a D-SLR will be better for me in the long run. I know that there will be a pretty steep learning curve for myself if I get a D-SLR (I've never used a camera of that type before).

So basically, I'm looking to spend about $700-800 for not only the camera, but accessories like lenses, a case, and a sufficient memory device. Thanks for the help!
Retnuhrace is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Dec 20, 2006, 5:14 PM   #2
JohnG's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,529

It all comes down to your own personal standards. There isn't going to be a comparison on the wildlife and sports shots between the superzoom and a dslr with appropriate lens. Two completely different levels. But, the key part of that phrase is "with appropriate lens". Football, baseball and wildlife all require at least a 300mm lens to get really good shots - wildlife often requires as much reach as you can get. I have a 100-400mm lens with my DSLR - given the crop factor, that's like 640mm - longer than any superzoom without it's own teleconverter (and I honestly don't know how well the superzoom TCs work) and that is still short in many instances.

So, bottom line is - to stay within that budget if you try to include a lens at least 300mm (and still have another lens for other use) you're probably going to have a very cheap lens. I'll let other adress the macro shots - I don't shoot macro so I won't give an opinion of quality comparison between the two camera types or the expense involved to get a decent macro lens for a DSLR.

But, just sticking with wildlife and the sports you mentioned - you'd have to spend quite a bit more than your current budget (considering the cases, cards and other stuff you want to buy ) to be able to accomplish those goals (probably in the neighborhood of $1300 for camera, kit lens and something like a 70-300 for close up animal and daytime sports shots) with a good degree of quality. If you wanted to buy the cheapest setup out there you could probably do something like:

Canon 350d plus kit lens ($630) plus Sigma 70-300 ($205) = $835. But realize the Sigma lens is not fast focusing and it's soft after 250 or so and limited to use in relatively good light - so it should only be a stepping stone until you have more funds.

Alternatively you could get the Nikon D50 and kit lens for $600 plus the 205 sigma lens.

Add in your other stuff and you're sitting at around $1000 with bare bones equipment and at least the 70-300 needing replacing downthe road if you are serious about your wildlife and/or sports shots.

So, if you stretch your budget you could get started with a dslr. But if that budget represents all you want to spend for the next few years then you might be better off with a superzoom.
JohnG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2006, 5:03 PM   #3
Junior Member
Retnuhrace's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2

Ok thanks much for the advice...

Anyways, I just found out that my step-dad has some old Canon AE lenses. Now, being the newbie that I am, I shall ask: can I use those lenses on any other brand of DSLR? If not, I guess the logical thing to do is to get a Rebel XT.
Retnuhrace is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 7:21 AM.