Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Dec 6, 2006, 9:55 AM   #1
painintheuk's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 39

I am trying to decide which 'level' of new camera to buy (e.g. Canon 400D vs. 30D, Kodak 100D vs. 10D), which should make it easier to narrow the field!

Is it generally better to get a less expensive body and spend more on the lenses, or a more expensive body with less expensive lenses? I think, for example, that I could get a Canon 400D with 17-85IS lens for a 'similar' price to a 30D with a more economical 18-55mm lens. What is the best way to allocate cash between lens(es!) and camera body?

I'm not looking for actual recomendations today - just trying to narrow down the field!

painintheuk is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Dec 6, 2006, 10:07 AM   #2
JohnG's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,529

In almost all cases, you are better off spending money on lenses - they are a better long term investment. If you buy the RIGHT lens for your needs (not just a more expensive lens but the right lens for what you need) the lens will outlive several camera bodies. Lenses also hold their value better, so even if your needs change you can often sell a quality lens for 70-80% what you paid for it down the road.
JohnG is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:18 AM.