Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Dec 17, 2006, 9:43 PM   #1
Junior Member
prince_k's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2

What camera will perform better, an older professional dslr or a new entry level dslr? For example, there's the eos 1d 4.2mp and there's the digital rebel xti 10.1mp.
prince_k is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Dec 17, 2006, 10:07 PM   #2
Senior Member
rfortson's Avatar
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 349

I'd say the newer cameras will outshine the older ones, but you need to look at the specific features you're interested in. For example, the older camera may have a larger buffer, or better metering. However, in general many of yesterday's "pro" features are now found in today's entry level dSLRs.

rfortson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 18, 2006, 5:30 AM   #3
Super Moderator
Mark1616's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,456

Hi Prince and welcome.

It is going to depend on the sort of photography you are going to want to do and how large you will want to print your work/how much you want to crop after taking the shot. The major downside of the original 1d is that it is only 4.2mp which is by today's standards not high, however with interpolation you will be able to get this to a reasonable 15" x 10" as I have done this quite a few times from cropped images.

There are very nice features if you are shooting sports such as 45 point AF and 8fps both of which are fantastic for this work! Another advantage in getting a reduced dof (depth of field) which is desirable in both sport and portrait work is the crop factor of this camera is 1.3x rather than the 1.6 of the xti, this has a negative side that lenses don't appear to be as long so it depends what you want from a camera. I would check what warranty the camera would have and how many actuations of the shutter have been made as it is Pro leveland could have been heavily used.

Hope that gives you something to work on.

Mark1616 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 18, 2006, 9:55 AM   #4
Junior Member
prince_k's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2

Mark1616 and rfortson, thank you both for your comments. I will use those things as a starting point for more research.
prince_k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 18, 2006, 11:18 PM   #5
steve's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,535

And don't forget that the 1D is like a M1A1 tank vs a Volkswagen when compared to the XTi both in its build quality/reliability and weight. The 1D is a pro camera in every aspect but it weighs a ton especially if you fit it with an "L" lens - carry this bad boy around for an hour, even with a padder shoulder strap and you know it

Another major difference is the shutter mechanism life, the 1D lasts about 10 times longer before failure. However technology moves on and it is amazing what you get for less than $1000 nowadays versus what cost $6K or more just a few years ago.
steve is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:31 AM.