Steve'sDigicams

SkyShoot · Jul 6, 2008, 5:19 AM

seriously planning buying. if can afford (which is still questionable) Fuji S100 or Olympus E-420, of E-520 if S100 will be (more or less temporaly) unavailable.
and suggestions (excepts other models advisory) will be very [warmply]welcomed.

TCav · Jul 6, 2008, 8:58 AM

If you've ruled out other cameras, the E-520 is a fine choice. It has everything the E-420 has, plus sensor shift image stabilization.

Image stabilization is most usefull when using longer lenses, but it's never a bad idea to have it.

SkyShoot · Jul 6, 2008, 9:48 AM

E-520 just as fallback option "if no S100's avaivable in shops".
they(in same ocasion) maybe Sony A200.
any other - Canon S1000, Pentax K200 ?
perform bad. especially for DSLR. if had no [other]choice, i try them, but, at last resort.

whisky_n_whisky · Jul 18, 2008, 10:41 PM

a friend just got s100fs. normaly i would say a dslr will be much better then any p&s, but this camera is so good that is convinience is about to change my mind. up to iso800 (including 800) s100fs has a super solid performance and neck to neck iso performance. dynamic range of the camera is just incredible (again neck to neck with dslrs thanks to its large sensor 2 thirds). having such a good zoom range is such a bonus and will save you money from buying lenses (and its good quality piece of glass they used on fuji). normaly i wouldnt compare any dslr with a point and shoot but if you got s100fs over entry level dslr's i would NOT say u made a mistake.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

Steve'sDigicams

Recent Camera Reviews

Most Active Forums

Most Popular Deals

Latest Feature Articles

Jul 6, 2008, 5:19 AM	#1
SkyShoot Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 99	seriously planning buying. if can afford (which is still questionable) Fuji S100 or Olympus E-420, of E-520 if S100 will be (more or less temporaly) unavailable. and suggestions (excepts other models advisory) will be very [warmply]welcomed.

Jul 6, 2008, 8:58 AM	#2
TCav Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland Posts: 13,826	If you've ruled out other cameras, the E-520 is a fine choice. It has everything the E-420 has, plus sensor shift image stabilization. Image stabilization is most usefull when using longer lenses, but it's never a bad idea to have it.

Jul 6, 2008, 9:48 AM	#3
SkyShoot Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Posts: 99	E-520 just as fallback option "if no S100's avaivable in shops". they(in same ocasion) maybe Sony A200. any other - Canon S1000, Pentax K200 ? perform bad. especially for DSLR. if had no [other]choice, i try them, but, at last resort.

Jul 18, 2008, 10:41 PM	#4
whisky_n_whisky Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Posts: 48	a friend just got s100fs. normaly i would say a dslr will be much better then any p&s, but this camera is so good that is convinience is about to change my mind. up to iso800 (including 800) s100fs has a super solid performance and neck to neck iso performance. dynamic range of the camera is just incredible (again neck to neck with dslrs thanks to its large sensor 2 thirds). having such a good zoom range is such a bonus and will save you money from buying lenses (and its good quality piece of glass they used on fuji). normaly i wouldnt compare any dslr with a point and shoot but if you got s100fs over entry level dslr's i would NOT say u made a mistake.