|
![]() |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 99
|
![]()
seriously planning buying. if can afford (which is still questionable) Fuji S100 or Olympus E-420, of E-520 if S100 will be (more or less temporaly) unavailable.
and suggestions (excepts other models advisory) will be very [warmply]welcomed. |
![]() |
![]() |
Sponsored Links |
|
![]() |
#2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,826
|
![]()
If you've ruled out other cameras, the E-520 is a fine choice. It has everything the E-420 has, plus sensor shift image stabilization.
Image stabilization is most usefull when using longer lenses, but it's never a bad idea to have it. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 99
|
![]()
E-520 just as fallback option "if no S100's avaivable in shops".
they(in same ocasion) maybe Sony A200. any other - Canon S1000, Pentax K200 ? perform bad. especially for DSLR. if had no [other]choice, i try them, but, at last resort. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 48
|
![]()
a friend just got s100fs. normaly i would say a dslr will be much better then any p&s, but this camera is so good that is convinience is about to change my mind. up to iso800 (including 800) s100fs has a super solid performance and neck to neck iso performance. dynamic range of the camera is just incredible (again neck to neck with dslrs thanks to its large sensor 2 thirds). having such a good zoom range is such a bonus and will save you money from buying lenses (and its good quality piece of glass they used on fuji). normaly i wouldnt compare any dslr with a point and shoot but if you got s100fs over entry level dslr's i would NOT say u made a mistake.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|