Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Dec 31, 2005, 2:43 AM   #1
Junior Member
Kesserendrel's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 6

I am a flyfishing guide and freelance writer looking for a camera that I can use to produce photographic support for my magazine articles, for "trophy shots" that I can process in Photoshop and sell back to my clients, for wildlife photography (in Yellowstone) to decorate the shop where I work (and, of course, to sell prints off the walls, if anyone is interested), and to produce images for the shop's website (www.parksflyshop.com, virtually all pics were taken with a 3.2MP Kodak DX6340 and edited with Elements 3.0 --you can see why I want to upgrade). I also may be taking a trip to Scotland as a present to myself for finishing grad school.

A long zoom really is a necessity, because I want to be able to get shots of animals in the park as well as closer shots of fish, riverscapes, and fishermen. Therefore, I'd need the 2 lens kit for the Evolt. All told, I figure I'll be spending about $950 on the camera, memory, and filters if I go this route. The Evolt is without doubt a more cabable camera, but in the two lens kit form it'd also be about $300 more expensive. Is it worth it, given the above requirements? Are there other cameras I haven't thought about and should?

I should note that I'm really a pretty amateur photographer (though I aim to change that). I've had 3 pictures printed in magazines, plus the web shots, but I certainly can't afford or justify anything beyond an entry-level DSLR.

I just found this forum, after reading virtually all of Steve's reviews it seems. It's interesting.
Kesserendrel is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Dec 31, 2005, 3:29 AM   #2
Senior Member
robbo's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 978

I have neither camera. I do have a Fuji S5200. I had a Fuji S7000. I have a Pentax *ist DS DSLR. I have liked the Fujis. Though their picture quality is not as good as a DSLR in most cases, they take good shots. They're also much easier to carry around than a DSLR with lenses. If you don't mind carrying maybe the twice the weight with a DSLR, you will probably get better shots with the Evolt, at least in daylight. However, the S9000 can put out some very good shots, too.

If you have a chance, go to a store, pick up both cameras and see how they feel. If you have a spare CF or SD or xD card, take a shot or two with each and compare the photo quality.

I like my Pentax. If I were going to buy another entry level DSLR, I would pick the Konica Minolta 5D, which has built in image stabilizaton and pretty decent picture quality at high ISO's. I think its price is comparable to that of the Evolt.
robbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 31, 2005, 7:25 PM   #3
Senior Member
mtclimber's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143

I own both the Fuji S-9000 and the Olympus E-500. The E-500 is clearly the better digital camera, and it is well worth the extra expense.

mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54 PM.