Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Aug 4, 2010, 10:28 PM   #11
Senior Member
FiveO's Avatar
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,130

I won't restate what's already been said here. Get one of these instead.
Disclaimer: I take photos of life rather than live to take photos and my opinions of cameras are reflected accordingly.
FiveO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2010, 1:45 AM   #12
Junior Member
fotocopy's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 9

can't be used for books, you need a power supply and a computer
and it's still bigger than a camera.
I'm surprised that there are obviously no cameras specialized in photocopying ?!?

ahh, no power supply or computer needed
> Portable & Wireless scanner Scan documents wherever you are!


so, to compare with a camera,
how much memory, how much time needed per picture,
how long last batteries

length, weight


yes, that scanner looks also good to me.

better than a camera in speed, easy handling.
Camera can do dinA4-books, newspapers, are not so long (-->pocket)

Last edited by fotocopy; Aug 6, 2010 at 2:30 AM.
fotocopy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2010, 2:04 AM   #13
Junior Member
fotocopy's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 9

OK, I tried it with an old lumix ls3

2MB .jpg file, normal room-light, no lightning

you can well read the text.

The problem with the corners being more distant from
the camera than the middle could be resolved by

1) photograph from greater distance, (1m ?) and then zoom in
2) make 2 or more pictures with different focus and calculate
the resulting one picture (assuming rectangular layout
of the book/paper) automatically

Last edited by fotocopy; Aug 6, 2010 at 2:44 AM.
fotocopy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 6, 2010, 1:14 PM   #14
Senior Member
TCav's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,825

Good luck with that.
  • The lens is the thing.
  • 'Full Frame' is the new 'Medium Format'.
  • "One good test is worth a thousand expert opinions." - Tex Johnston, Boeing 707 test pilot.
TCav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 13, 2010, 12:39 PM   #15
Senior Member
RioRico's Avatar
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: In mountainous California or Arizona or Guatemala or somewhere.
Posts: 224

I think these are the parameters of this problem:

* OP can't haul scanner + computer into libraries
* Photographing flat pages requires a copy station

Back before personal copiers hit the market, my father-in-law (a detective) bought a document photo-copying station, about the size of a large photo enlarger setup, i.e. a medium-size refrigerator. It was certainly less portable than a desktop scanner + laptop, which he migrated to as soon as they became available.

Photographing pages is a non-trivial endeavour. Minimum needed: a flat, low table; a stand for the camera; a non-reflective clear plate to hold target pages flat; correct lighting; a camera, either with copy film or a high-resolution sensor; a flat-field lens of an appropriate focal length, preferably a short macro; power supplies for camera and maybe lights; patience and perseverance.

OP is certainly welcome to try document copying with a camera. But many libraries have periodicals on microfiche, or digitized, and have their own copying facilities. Depending on OP's image-quality requirements and financial situation, it may be better to pay for copies.
Too many film+digi cams+lenses, oh my -- Pentax K20D, ZX-M, M42's, P&S's, more
The opposite of LIBERAL is not CONSERVATIVE, but ENSLAVED.

Last edited by RioRico; Aug 13, 2010 at 12:43 PM.
RioRico is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 13, 2010, 1:00 PM   #16
Senior Member
perdendosi's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 378

Well, today, I just downloaded a free app called "Genius Scan" for my iPhone. It allows you to take pictures of documents, enhance them, and then forward them either as a picture or as a PDF.

I opened one in Acrobat, and did OCR on it, and saved it. It looks like the 5MP resolution of my iPhone 4 was certainly good enough to get all of the B&W text on an 8 1/2 x 11 page, with only natural lighting. Is it a great "photocopy"? No. But does it capture the page well enough for you to read the words, and for Acrobat to OCR them? Yup.

This took me probably 2 minutes total, including e-mailing the document. So probably not great if you want to do 100 pages from a book, but if you've only got one or two... what a deal!
Attached Images
File Type: pdf test1.pdf (301.7 KB, 68 views)
perdendosi is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 3:01 PM.