Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums >

LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Nov 29, 2011, 3:23 PM   #11
Super Moderator
peripatetic's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,599

I would be inclined to go for a Canon 60D + kit lens + 70-300 IS. You should be able to get that for close to $1500.

Trip of a lifetime and all that.

Although the new Fuji XS1 looks pretty cool too.
My gallery
My X100 blog

Last edited by peripatetic; Nov 29, 2011 at 3:25 PM.
peripatetic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 1, 2011, 1:53 PM   #12
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2
Default Thanks all

Wow, thanks to all for the great feedback. Someone made a great point abuot the interchangeable lens options - not a lot of lens choice, plus my distaste about lack of viewfinder, means it does sound like a good option to elminate that from the running.

I'm leaning toward a decision b/t a 60d vs. fz150 at this point. (The fuji looks killer, but i'd want time pre-trip to get to know the cam since I've never used theirs, and that might be dicey as we leave the last day of Feb). I guess it's up to me to decide whether I want one cam I don't have to swap lenses on or a bigger, heavier camera that requires lens swaps but will have arguably faster response time for wildlife.

Keep the suggestions coming if anyone else has opinions - and I'll continue reading and waffling in my mind :-)
zeitgeist09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 1, 2011, 2:40 PM   #13
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 8,529

sent you a PM on where to look for more information.
JohnG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 1, 2011, 2:58 PM   #14
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 410

Err, not just faster response time. A DSLR's larger sensor and RAW format result in a better quality image for later processing. If you are determined to just go with the out-of-the-camera image, zero post processing, then the DSLR advantage becomes moot.

KCook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 1, 2011, 4:11 PM   #15
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Bangor,North Wales
Posts: 3,762

The FZ-150 doesn't want for speed- in any area...!
And shoots RAW.....
SIMON40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Dec 1, 2011, 4:22 PM   #16
Senior Member
Wes James's Avatar
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: NE Florida
Posts: 332

One of the M4/3 cameras with a 75-300mm lens would give you 150-600mm 35mm equivalent reach, 0r a 100-300mm zoom= 200-600mm equivalent. I have an E-PL2 with the 75-300 and the external electronic viewfinder- the newest E-P3 is the fastest of the M4/3 cameras. Good image quality, RAW, and better build quality.
So many choices, eh??
Have a wonderful trip- and share some of your pic's here!
Wes James is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:00 AM.