Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > What Camera Should I Buy?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Sep 21, 2006, 9:05 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
treaty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7
Default

First time DSLR purchase. I'm moving up from a point and shoot.

Having trouble deciding on the cheaper, lighter *ist DL or the newer K100D. With the rebate, the *ist DL kit with lens is a steal at about $150 less then the K100D kit, but I'm wondering if I'm going to miss the "Anti-shake" feature that the k100d offers.

Anyone have any experience with the Anti-shake on the k100d? Do you think it's worth the extra $$ for a newbie photographer?


treaty is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Sep 21, 2006, 10:53 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 150
Default

Shake reduction isn't the only thing what is different in those models.

K100D have faster and better AF system, improved JPEG processor and better tuned exposure system.
Edvinas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 22, 2006, 9:00 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
mtngal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Frazier Park, CA
Posts: 16,056
Default

The DL is a very nice camera for the price. As was stated above, the K100D does have some improvements over the DL,the way it meters and the AF. Just my personal experience is that the jpg conversion improvement isn't that much, and the metering changeis nice, but not something that can't be dealt with by changing a setting or what you meter from. The AF is the main thing I've noticed with the D100D, as well as the in-camera anti-shake (Pentax calls it Shake Reduction, or SR).

SR is going to be a deal breaker for some people, and not a big deal to others. I've been very impressed with it - thought my pictures were just a bit better overall, and its wonderful whenin non-flash, low light conditions, or if you use long telephoto lenses a lot. I love my K100D, but haven't sold my DS (earlier model than the DL), just keep a wide-normal zoom on it and the telephoto lenses on the K100D.

If money is the biggest thing, then get the DL. If you are a bit shaky, or use long telephoto most of the time, then get the K100D, it will make a difference.
mtngal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 22, 2006, 9:08 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 284
Default

If you can afford the $150 difference i would go for the K100D as well - i tried it out and the autofocus is definitely faster than the DL I have. The DL was a steal at the beginning of July when the drastically cut the cost - i paid $367 after rebate with the kit lens. if i were choosing now i think the newer model is worth the price difference.
milrodpxpx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 22, 2006, 4:15 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
mtngal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Frazier Park, CA
Posts: 16,056
Default

Another thought/difference. The DL is a little lighter and smaller than the K100D (it's noticable). That might not mean much to many people, but if both cameras had been out when I was originally looking, I might have chosen the DL over the K100D just because of that (I'm small and a hiker, so weight and sizeare definitely issues for me). On the other hand, since I was used to the added weight/size of a dSLR, the extra ounces that the K100D has over the DL wasn't an issue for me when it came out.

The size and shape of the grip are slightly different, so if you can, go to a camera store that has both and handle them. You may find that you prefer one over the other. I have no regrets upgrading to the K100D and for me, these are very minor issues.
mtngal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 22, 2006, 6:01 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
treaty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 7
Default

Thanks for the feedback everyone. I have gone to a local camera store and held both models... they are pretty simillar, but I did notice the DL was lighter and the grip was a bit more comfortable for me. I also thought I noticed that the DL's AF was a little slower, but good to hear confirmation on that... the k100d was noticibly heavier, but it's likely that there will be lots of low light indoor shots taken with the camera where the shake reduction may come into play, which is why I'm even considering that model... (my wife will also use the camera and she's a cat sitter... lots of pictures of indoor cats ).

hmm... well I'll let you know which one I decide on when I make a decision... leaning toward the newer model at the moment, but still undecided...
treaty is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 8:54 AM.