Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > What Camera Should I Buy?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jun 22, 2010, 9:13 PM   #1
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: East Bay, CA
Posts: 44
Default Should I get a Nikon D90 or a Panasonic GH1?

I can not decide, please help?
I am interested in Image quality, build quality and overall performance. I now the Panasonic is smaller but that is not a selling point for me.
Thanks
vsanzbajo is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jun 22, 2010, 9:43 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
mtclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
Default

i would stay away from m4/3.

Sarah Joyce
mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 9:45 PM   #3
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: East Bay, CA
Posts: 44
Default

How come? Anything I should be aware of Sarah?
vsanzbajo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 9:57 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
shoturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348
Default

Depends on what you like to shoot, if you need low light or action. A full dslr would be a better tool. I shoot both m4/3 and a dslr. M4/3's big advantage is compact size. As it makes for a good travel companion. The Panny is also a very good tool if HDR if it is something you are interested in. But at the moment lenses are a bit on the expensive size with m4/3. And they do not have as many options yet, though they are growing. The AF system on the panny is good, but not as good as the d90.
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.

Last edited by shoturtle; Jun 22, 2010 at 10:00 PM.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 22, 2010, 9:59 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
mtclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
Default

Yes, it is just a personal opinion, but I feel the M4/3 are over priced and under featured. Look carefully, and compare any M4/3 camera against a DSLR like the Canon T1i, and you will see very little difference.

Sarah Joyce

Last edited by mtclimber; Jun 22, 2010 at 10:01 PM.
mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 2010, 11:11 PM   #6
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: East Bay, CA
Posts: 44
Default

I am leaning towards the Panasonic, cheaper. Please let me know if you think I am making a mistake
vsanzbajo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 2010, 11:30 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
shoturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348
Default

With the GH1, you get a much better camera for HDR and HD video. But if you are into action shooting, it is not as good as a dslr. In low light the DSLR is better as the GH1 is only good to about 800iso. But if compact size is important to you, the GH1 is smaller and easier to travel with.

The GH1 unlike the new G2 and G10 can not use all the 4/3 lenses on the market with and adapter. So that can be a concern. That issue will be resolved in the GH2.
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 24, 2010, 11:41 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
mtclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
Default

It really depends on what you want to shoot. The D-90 triumphs in high ISO capability, and as an action shot camera, with the very best flash system in the industry.

Panasonic is very weak, with a very limited selection in external flashes. The GH-1 is ISO limited, does excellent video, but is sure not an action camera. You just have many more features and capabilities available to you with the Nikon D-90.

Sarah Joyce
mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2010, 12:05 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
shoturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348
Default

The GH1 has a heck of a lens, the 14-140mm HD lens is a really good lens. If brought separately it is 800 dollars just for the lens.
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 25, 2010, 1:42 AM   #10
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: East Bay, CA
Posts: 44
Default

But the GH1 takes quality pictures, right?
vsanzbajo is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 PM.