Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > What Camera Should I Buy?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jul 14, 2010, 12:01 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Koolpc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Under The Desk (UK)
Posts: 597
Default Camera choice, again!!

Nikon D3000 with 18-55mm VR Lens

Canon EOS 1000D + 18-55mm Kit


Quite like these 2 and i have been to a camera shop to 'feel / check them out' but still unsure if one is a better bet than the other. Want a DSLR for general family use with maybe some more specialised photography sometime in the future.

I only have a max of approx 350 to spend and i really want to buy new. Not sure about 2nd hand as worried about problems arising with faulty goods and nowhere to turn when needed!

Any advice about the above 2 would be great or if you want to point me towards another of the same price that you think might be better then please do.

Wasn't too fussy with the Sony A290 when i went to see it!
Koolpc is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jul 14, 2010, 12:18 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 5
Default

It's a hard choice. Each camera has it's advantages and disadvantages. The canon xs offers a live view feature (i think only in certain modes though) that may or may not interest you. Nikon has, i believe, a 11-point system where as canon uses a 7 in the xs model.

I would recommend googling "canon xs vs nikon d5000" and different variations ( i canon rebel 1000d..), there are tons of comparison articles already out there .

As far as the kit lens go, from what Ive read, some ppl love it and some think its a waste of time. Personal opinion: I believe that for the 100 bucks difference it a good starter lense and price is worth it.

Wish I could be more help, still new to this!
megfourfun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 14, 2010, 2:40 PM   #3
Member
 
jWest's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 71
Default

The Canon has a small margin over the Nikon in sharpness, color reproduction, and high-ISO noise levels. It also has Live View, which the Nikon lacks. Some find Live View annoying, others find it useful.

Ultimately, if you didn't have any preference after trying them both out, I would say go with the Canon 1000D.
jWest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 14, 2010, 2:52 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
shoturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348
Default

The 1000D is the XS, the XSi is the 450D which is a better camera then the 1000D.
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 14, 2010, 3:17 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
TCav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Koolpc View Post
... Want a DSLR for general family use with maybe some more specialised photography sometime in the future. ...(emphasis mine. - TCav)
Thats' the part that will make one choice a pleasure and the other a pain.

The D3000 and the 1000D are both capable cameras, and can handle everything you say you want to do. It's that "more specialized" part that can make or break either one.

Can you elaborate.
__________________
  • The lens is the thing.
  • 'Full Frame' is the new 'Medium Format'.
  • "One good test is worth a thousand expert opinions." - Tex Johnston, Boeing 707 test pilot.
TCav is online now   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 14, 2010, 3:18 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
shoturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348
Default

lens wise the the 1000d have more options, the the d3000.
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 14, 2010, 3:57 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Koolpc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Under The Desk (UK)
Posts: 597
Default

I really like the 450D but just can't afford one, new. I don't feel happy buying one 2nd hand.
Koolpc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 14, 2010, 4:06 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
Koolpc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Under The Desk (UK)
Posts: 597
Default

Ok, lets make this 3 cameras. What about:

Sony A290

Approx 400 brand new, over my budget but a very new camera with built in stabalization etc.

Last edited by Koolpc; Jul 14, 2010 at 4:17 PM.
Koolpc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 14, 2010, 4:32 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
shoturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348
Default

I would go with a cmos sensor over the CDD sensor.
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 14, 2010, 4:36 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Koolpc's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Under The Desk (UK)
Posts: 597
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by shoturtle View Post
I would go with a cmos sensor over the CDD sensor.
So, the Sony has a CDD sensor? I am a noob when it comes to all things DSLR?

What is the difference and why would you choose CMOS? Which cameras have CMOS?
Koolpc is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 PM.