Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > What Camera Should I Buy?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Aug 10, 2010, 1:50 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 6
Default Best image quality for $400 or less

The title of this post says it all: I want a camera with which I can produce the best possible images (of what I'll tell you in a minute) for $400 or less. It's obviously a tall order, but note that of course I'm not expecting DSLR-like results. I typically take pictures of:
(1) fast and/or erratically moving subjects (read: my two-year-old son)
(2) small subjects and/or subjects whose fine detail I want to capture. In particular, this means things like flowers, plants, and food.

Other things that I would like in a camera:
(a) Ideally, I'd like something that does decently well in low(ish) light conditions.
(b) Good auto mode for snapshots but also manual control over focal length, aperture, etc.
I don't really care about size or weight.

Based on what I could find in this forum and elsewhere, three good options seem to be:
Canon PowerShot S90
Panasonic Lumix DMC-LX3
Samsung TL500/EX1

Based on the desiderata that I list: (i) Can you think of anything else I should consider? (ii) What do you think I should get? Thanks very much for your help. -Matt

Last edited by MattTomCarl; Aug 11, 2010 at 6:31 AM. Reason: spelling
MattTomCarl is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Aug 10, 2010, 2:09 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
mtclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
Default

My vote goes for the Samsung TL-500/EX-1 camera. It is a great camera and has more flexibility.

Here is a link to one of my EX-1 photos:

http://anchorse.smugmug.com/Other/Sa...15_zjDCo-L.jpg

Sarah Joyce
mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2010, 5:54 AM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 6
Default

Thanks for the suggestion, mtclimber--that photo does look really good.

I have to admit I find it surprising that Samsung makes a camera of that level of quality, but the proof is in the pudding as they say.

Anyone else?

Last edited by MattTomCarl; Aug 11, 2010 at 6:30 AM.
MattTomCarl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2010, 7:43 AM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,487
Default

Matt,

We own several and they are all good in their respective area...you sound like you want to compare IQ yourself and get ideas from others...Comparometer:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP/COMPS01.HTM

Image Quality is quite good on:
S90 and the FZ35 up to ISO800
ZS7 can do ISO400 reasonably well

But from what Dustin and Shoturtle are discussing about the E-PL1 at around $400 USD I would give it a close look as it will surpass any of the above in IQ...compare for yourself though, as seeing is believing...I think you really can't beat that deal for DSLR like Quality and they actually have a 70-300mm(?) zoom lens that will adapt to it also and give you equivalent 600mm zoom factor...

Heck they even have me looking at it also...lol
LTZ470 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2010, 10:55 AM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 6
Default

Thanks for the suggestion. I seem to be looking in the wrong place, though--the lowest price I can find on the E-PL1 is $469. I could go a bit over $400, but $70 over is pushing it. Did I miss a better deal somewhere else?
MattTomCarl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2010, 12:26 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
Tullio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,370
Default

I haven't seen the EPL1 going for less than $510, so be careful. Check the seller's reputation first.

IMO, the perfect camera does not exist, no mater what. Each brand/model has its positives and negatives. Make a priority list. If say size is the most important feature, you automatically eliminate quite a few options. If low light performance is at the top, then the list changes quite a bit. You get my point.
__________________

Tullio
Tullio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2010, 12:31 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
algold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Israel
Posts: 369
Default

Sarah, first of all I have to say, that I haven't used Samsung, most likely this is a very good camera, but the image in your link doesn't really show this.
The EXIF data in you shot show 1/45", f/2.8, ISO160 taken late in the morning (if the clock is correct) and lit with what looks like a north facing window on a bright day. And we are looking at a low res image, which hides lots of image imperfections. IMHO just about any modern camera can take a decent pic in these conditions. To really show what a camera can do, it would be better to provide an image of a moving subject at ISO400, better yet above that, and to include a 100% crop.
Best regards,
Alex
algold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 11, 2010, 2:02 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
mtclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
Default

Alex-

I certainly agree with you. However, I was not attempting to compete in any competition. Instead I grabbed a photo from my files, which was adequate for the purposes of our discussion.

Unfortunately with a severely disabled husband, I simply do not get out as much as I used to for the purposes of shooting test photos.

Sarah Joyce
mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 12, 2010, 10:59 AM   #9
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 6
Default

Tullio, your advice is well-taken. I tried to list some such priorities in my original post. It's most important for me to be able to take clear pictures of moving subjects (which are relatively close) and clear pictures displaying fine detail of small objects (e.g. flowers). All things being equal, I prefer not to use a flash. Probably no one camera is best for each of these tasks, but I would like to get the camera that, subject to my budget constraints, performs those tasks *on balance* better than any other. I hope that's informative enough to be helpful.
MattTomCarl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 12, 2010, 6:34 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Tullio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 7,370
Default

For moving objects, any DSLR will most likely outperform P&S as they offer a faster AF system. However, the gap has been drastically reduced in the recent past and the DSLR advantage is becoming less and less evident in this area. As for shooting small objects, most P&S offer excellent macro capabilities and produce fine images with plenty of details. The problem with many P&S is with their inability to reproduce the detail when shooting landscape. I recently purchased a Panasonic ZS6 (12x zoom). It takes great macro shots but you can't crop any landscape shot too much because the image then looks like a Monet painting.
__________________

Tullio
Tullio is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:56 AM.