Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > What Camera Should I Buy?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Aug 20, 2010, 1:27 AM   #11
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 6
Default

Thank you all for all the information you provided me with, I went to B and H today and got the e-pl1, I hope I made a good decision although I am having a little doubt. Anyways should I purchase a uv filter/protective filter for the lens?
disneyguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2010, 1:35 AM   #12
Senior Member
 
shoturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348
Default

No on the filter protector, but I would get a haze 1 filter. It does cut haze and is useful. Congrats on the camera.

What are your doubts about the epl-1?
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2010, 1:51 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
shoturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348
Default

PS

You may want to check out the olympus m4/3 section. There is a collection of useful info that is posted there.

http://forums.steves-digicams.com/ol...ur-thirds-103/
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2010, 1:56 AM   #14
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 6
Default

Thanks, I was just thinking maybe I should have gone with the pentax k-x? I think it's the lack of the e-pl1 not including a view finder that's bothering me, I don't know, maybe I just need some more time to fool around with the e-pl1.
disneyguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 20, 2010, 2:11 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
shoturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348
Default

with the kit lens the epl-1 is very easy to use with the lcd. It is when you move into longer lenses that the vf2 really comes into play. It is hands down the best electronic viewfinder on the market include external and internal ones form all cameras. If you ask anyone that has used the vf2, they will tell you it is just a fastastic add on.

But one of the big thing you said you want to do is HD. And honestly, I shoot the k-x and the t1i, and they are just not that good for HD video. And the pentax is okay for hd, but no where as good as the olympus, and even behind the canon at 720p. You really can not shoot hd well with a dslr, as you need to use the lcd. And if you went the route of the vf2, you can shoot HD with the camera to your eye.

Now HD was not one of the big things you mention. The pentax would be more favorable. But it is still a larger system, so it is not as good to travel with. My wife flies over 200k miles a year. And the epl1 is so much easier to travel with then the canon. She loves shooting the canon before we got the epl1. But because of the added size. She did not take it with her allot. The epl1 on the other hand, I do not get to use as often as she always has it.

If you were a very low light shooter, or action shoot. The kx would be the better tool.

But noise and image quality wise, the epl1 is a match for the kx from 100-1600iso. Which is where you want to shoot at for general photography. It give the be iq and least noise. The sensor is better in these range then the new sony apsc sensor that will be in the nikon d3100 the new sony dslr and most likely the new pentax.

But BH has a good return policy if you still unsure about it. But if you have any question, feel free to PM me.

Just one suggestion if you shoot in P or the manual modes Ienhance picture style is awesome
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2010, 12:34 PM   #16
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 6
Default

So I played with the epl1 a little more, the pictures look great but I still am thinking to go return it and get the pentax k-x, I think the main reason I am not so happy is because the k-x was a lot faster at auto focusing and it has a built in view finder. I mean I like the epl1 art modes and stuff since I don't do photo editing really (I edit video mostly). The size difference didn't really bother me since the pentax k-x was quite small for a dslr. It's just getting me all confused because I don't know what to do, I am leaving on vacation in 2 days.
disneyguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 21, 2010, 12:46 PM   #17
Senior Member
 
shoturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348
Default

If you are going for the video, I will be honest, the epl1 is the better choice. You will not be happy with the k-x's HD and focus for HD. In HD mode the K-x has very slow focus. Allot slower then the epl-1.

Also have you check the firmware of the epl-1. If it is not at 1.1 update it, it get a faster.
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2010, 8:15 AM   #18
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 6
Default

Let me ask this, lets ignore video as a priority. Between the k-x and the e-pl1 which will produce the greater quality image?
disneyguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2010, 2:48 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
shoturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348
Default

They are honestly about the same. I have shot them both. And they are so close in image quality in RAW. But in Jpeg the EPL-1 is just better. Here is a link of the epl-1 against my T1i, And the epl-1 just as good. Also, the epl-1 correct for lens short comings, at higher iso, the k-x has a green fringe on lighting, while the epl-1 corrects it out. It is above the 1600iso that the k-x takes the lead and in action shooting.

http://forums.steves-digicams.com/wi...s-germany.html
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.

Last edited by shoturtle; Aug 22, 2010 at 3:08 PM.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2010, 3:06 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Tumbleweed, Arizona
Posts: 1,381
Default

Overall, there is no perfect camera. Each model has shortcomings. What you try to do is to accentuate the positives while minimizing the negatives. Photography is an exercise in compromising.

There will always be a better camera the does something better - then it becomes the endless equipment chase. What you as the photographer need to do, is to learn / understand your equipment, understand the situation that you are going to photograph, and then create a situation where you are able to get the shot (or video) that you want, while setting the camera up in such a way or advantageous position so that it is able to capture it for you.

Will it always work. No, but you can usually get close (i.e., the 70% solution), and along the way, you will take images (or videos) that you were not expecting.

It all comes down to working with the light.....


Last edited by interested_observer; Aug 22, 2010 at 3:09 PM.
interested_observer is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:35 AM.