Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > What Camera Should I Buy?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Aug 22, 2010, 12:14 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3
Default Entry Level DSLR - $400-$600

Hey y'all, how's everyone?

I'm looking to get an entry-level DSLR with a price range of $400-600. I'd be using it for sports shots as well as stills.

So far I've looked at the D40 and D3000 mainly, not much at the other brands. I don't have any previous cameras/lenses aside from using my family's point & shoot, so I suppose I don't have any monetary reason to stick to a particular brand.

I have no qualms buying used, but I don't know if this is a good/bad thing as far as cameras go.

I'd appreciate any help you might give
F15pilotX is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Aug 22, 2010, 12:22 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
shoturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348
Default

wait a bit, the new nikon d3100 looks very promising.
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2010, 12:32 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
TCav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,543
Default

What types of sports? ... and what level of play?
__________________
  • The lens is the thing.
  • 'Full Frame' is the new 'Medium Format'.
  • "One good test is worth a thousand expert opinions." - Tex Johnston, Boeing 707 test pilot.
TCav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2010, 12:45 AM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3
Default

I suppose "sports" was rather inaccurate - I might do some ultimate frisbee, but more of just action shots, people running/moving around in general. Boating, etc.

I was looking on Adorama (found the link in another topic), and I saw I could get the D40 + a VR lens for ~500. Good idea/bad idea..?
F15pilotX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2010, 12:52 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
shoturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348
Default

If that is your budget, you may want to serious look at the pentax k-x over the d40 and d3000. The k-x is a better camera then both of the. It is very good for shooting normal action and sports. And it is a much better low light camera then either nikon. And it is about 520 dollar.
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2010, 1:49 AM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 3
Default

Wouldn't it be harder/more expensive to find lenses for a smaller brand like pentax? Also, I'd be doing a lot of still shots too (love nature shots), so how is it for that?

I did a bit of research after posting, and I came up with the following as a possible purchase; comments?

Camera Equipment:

UP-Strap ($27)
Hoya UV Filter ($20)
D40 Body ($349)
Nikon 18-55mm II Lens ($100)
F15pilotX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2010, 2:08 AM   #7
Senior Member
 
shoturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348
Default

it is not really a big difference between the pentax k-x and the d40 or d3000 with lenses. As the d40 and d3000 do not have a AF motor in the body. So it is limited to AF-s and AF-i lenses to work fully. So you can not use all the nikon lens, you have about 125-130 lens. While the pentax has about 90-100 lenses it can use.

If you were considering the d90, what would be a different story. Then that moves the nikon to over 200 lenses.

For what you are considering for the d40 and lens, I honestly would consider spending the extra 80 dollars for the k-x, and drop the UV filter. It is pretty useless to be honest. All it does is protect the lens at a cost of degrading image quality.

With the K-x you get a better AF system, and the camera shoots well upto 3200iso and shoot decent at 6400iso, and in a pinch you can use 12800iso, while the d40 and d3000, you really do not want to go past 1600. And they really do not have the Auto Focus system to keep up with action and way behind the k-x in this area.
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2010, 7:24 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
John.Pattullo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 613
Default

i'd say pentax k-x or wait and see how the nikon d3100 looks when it arrives though not sure on how its going to be priced
__________________
Flickr
PENTAX K-5 & PENTAX K-7
Pentax-DA 12-24mm f4 | Pentax-DA* 16-50mm f2.8 | Pentax-A 50mm f1.4 | Tamron 90mm f2.8 Macro | Pentax-DA* 60-250mm f4 | Sigma 150-500mm
Pentax Photo Gallery
John.Pattullo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2010, 7:28 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
TCav's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,543
Default

For that sports/action shooting, you might want to consider a factory refurbished Canon XSi. It's not as good in low light as the Pentax K-x that shoturtle mentioned, but it's better at action photography. Or, for a little more, there's a factory refurbished Canon T1i that's as good as the Pentax in low light.
__________________
  • The lens is the thing.
  • 'Full Frame' is the new 'Medium Format'.
  • "One good test is worth a thousand expert opinions." - Tex Johnston, Boeing 707 test pilot.

Last edited by TCav; Aug 22, 2010 at 7:31 AM.
TCav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2010, 11:24 AM   #10
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Savannah, GA (USA)
Posts: 22,378
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by F15pilotX View Post
I'm looking to get an entry-level DSLR with a price range of $400-600.
You may also want to look at the Sony A500. It's available with a Sony 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 kit lens for under $550 now at some vendors. Here's one example (add it to your cart to see it's price).

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...0_12_3_MP.html

Then, buy additional lenses to use with it later if you need them (and it can also use Minolta Autofocus lenses, so you can often find some bargains on used lenses for Sony dSLR models).

It does not have the ability to record video if that's something you're interested in. Chances are, that's one reason the A500 is available at it's current price point after recent price cuts at many vendors (since Sony has already announced it will be releasing more dSLR models this year, and they should have video ability). The Sony A500 also has *much* faster Autofocus using Live View compared to other dSLR models if Live View is a consideration, and it also has a tilting LCD.

The A500 is using a Sony 12MP CMOS Sensor with higher available ISO speeds compared to models using a Sony 10MP CCD Sensor (like the D3000 you're looking at). The A500 also has a faster frame rate using continuous drive mode compared to Nikon or Canon models in that price range.
JimC is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:36 AM.