Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > What Camera Should I Buy?

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Mar 15, 2011, 12:19 PM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 8
Default Zx5 - Is Integrated Battery Pack a deal breaker?

I already asked a similar question in another thread, but I am trying to narrow down my options.

Kodak PlaySport Zx5 is out today with a price tag of $179.
It has some significant improvements over a previous model Zx3. (today ~ $108)

1. It shoots in .MP4 instead of .MOV. <-- I like that! More editing options than with .MOV. Plus file size is usually smaller.
2. New Sharing capabilities. <-- Big plus if you ask me.... extended family abroad and all.
3. Shockproof. <-- I have small kids. That says it all!
4. Macro Mode.
5. Four Capture effects: B&W, sepia, Vivid, and 70s film style

Now, I am willing to pay extra $70 for these features. However, there is a big issue in my eyes:

Integrated Li-Ion rechargeable battery

Why, Kodak, why?

You have no way to change a battery. With an old version, you can buy a second battery pack that does not cost all that much, and carry it with you as a backup. In Cisco Flip Ultra
HD you can even use AA batteries as a backup. Here, once battery time runs out, you are done filming until you recharge and that takes hours.

So, in your eyes, is this a deal breaker or not?

mikeyank is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Mar 15, 2011, 3:32 PM   #2
Senior Member
gjtoth's Avatar
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Louisville, KY, USA
Posts: 6,944

It would be for me.
Gary ---- "The best camera is the one you have with you."
Pentax K-70 ~ Panasonic FZ1000 ~ Panasonic ZS40

My Gallery

Hebrews 13:3
gjtoth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 15, 2011, 11:22 PM   #3
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,130

Well everything made by Apple uses an integrated battery as well. I think it sucks but it didn't stop me from buying an iPod Nano. However, I got my Nano on Craigslist for $55 and I never use my iPod for more than 3 hours at a time.

For $180, I would be much more hesitant to buy something with an integrated battery. Also, with a camera, I am often swapping out batteries on trips to the zoo, vacations, and even sometimes on weekend backpacking trips. With the latter in mind, I think it would be a deal-breaker for me also.
Disclaimer: I take photos of life rather than live to take photos and my opinions of cameras are reflected accordingly.
FiveO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 16, 2011, 12:54 AM   #4
Senior Member
Hawgwild's Avatar
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 3,582

Always use tasteful words - you may have to eat them.
You cannot find knowledge by rearranging your ignorance.

My Flickr

Hawgwild is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Mar 16, 2011, 4:26 PM   #5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia, New South Wales central coast
Posts: 3,118

G'day mikey

As a serious photographer - I would never buy a camera system with non-interchangeable batteries ... the need to swap a battery mid shoot occurs for me all too often

It also means that your camera must be on the camera-dock all the time for it to be recharging between uses.
Q- what happens when you're on hols and away from a power point?

You mention "extended family abroad "
Q- what happens if you ever decide to visit them and you end up with the inevitable voltage and power connector issues?

Regards, Phil
Has Lumix mirrorless & superzoom cameras and loves their amazing capabilities
Spends 8-9 months each year travelling Australia
Recent images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/ozzie_traveller/sets/
Ozzie_Traveller is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 4:33 PM.