Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > What Camera Should I Buy?

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Feb 23, 2012, 9:58 AM   #1
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 6
Default Is there any concept of Compact SLR!!!

I am looking to buy a camera, but my requirement may sound complex..........

1) I want somewhat compact camera, as i don't want to carry around big bag with lens & taking shots.
2) Obviously, Pic quality should be good, i like SLR's, but its bulky....
3) Good powerful Optical Zoom & pixels
4) Faster shutter speed, not wait more than 2 or 3 seconds to take next snaps.
5) Price around $500 , little more or less

Is there like a compact SLR.....i would prefer that!!!

idealone05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Feb 23, 2012, 10:10 AM   #2
Senior Member
wave01's Avatar
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: North West England
Posts: 1,749

You could look at 4/3 like a olympus pen range nikon 1 series panasonic g series. these are smaller and still have inter changeable lenses
wave01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2012, 10:17 AM   #3
Senior Member
TCav's Avatar
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Washington, DC, Metro Area, Maryland
Posts: 13,691

The problem with what you're asking for is the "Faster shutter speed, not wait more than 2 or 3 seconds to take next snaps." part. There are two kinds of autofocus systems. The Phase Detect AF system uses a seperate set of sensors that can not only detect how out-of-focus a subject is, but in which direction the AF must move in order for the subject to be in focus. This is bigger and more complicated, and so requires a bigger, heavier, more expensive camera body, and so it's only found in dSLRs. The other type of AF system uses Contrast detection, which is much slower and much less precise, but it's simple and doesn't require any extra size or weight over the bare essentials of what makes a digital camera, but it makes the camera slower.

If you want to reduce shutter lag, you need a faster system, and faster systems require bigger, heavier, more expensive boxes.

The smallest dSLRs are from Olympus, but they're all but discontinued, and even they weren't pocketable.
  • The lens is the thing.
  • 'Full Frame' is the new 'Medium Format'.
  • "One good test is worth a thousand expert opinions." - Tex Johnston, Boeing 707 test pilot.

Last edited by TCav; Feb 23, 2012 at 10:19 AM.
TCav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2012, 10:58 AM   #4
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Bangor,North Wales
Posts: 3,755

You don't want to be carrying around bag/lenses...
Powerful optical zoom... and pixels..(I'll ignore the pixels bit..!!)
Fast shutter speed..(I'll assume you want fast autofocus also..)
Sounds like the Panasonic DMC-FZ150...!


Looks like an SLR- just smaller,pretty good image quality,great video capability,image stabilised 25-600mm zoom,class leading auto-focus speed,quick burst modes...

Probably the best compact DSLR would be the Panasonic G3- but you'll still need a bag and lenses...!
SIMON40 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 23, 2012, 2:12 PM   #5
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Australia, New South Wales central coast
Posts: 3,127

G'day I-1

You mention ...
Originally Posted by idealone05 View Post
I am looking to buy a camera, but my requirement may sound complex..........

4) ... not wait more than 2 or 3 seconds to take next snaps. ... thanks
Changing to an SLR will not solve this issue automatically

Every digital camera, within its menu system has a time-choice for how long the image just taken is displayed before you take the next photo. The menu header varies from camera to camera, but look for 'Preview"

You can vary this time [4sec, 2sec, 1sec zero etc] - some cameras have an option that you need to press the ok button to keep/save the image .. slows the system even more

I suggest that you investigate your existing camera to find this option so that you know more about it for any future camera

Regards, Phil
Has Lumix mirrorless & superzoom cameras and loves their amazing capabilities
Spends 8-9 months each year travelling Australia
Recent images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/ozzie_traveller/sets/
Ozzie_Traveller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Feb 27, 2012, 12:20 PM   #6
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 978

I don't know if you would be happy with the size or the picture quality (though I think I would), but like Simon, I would recommend the FZ150.
Check out the specs and reviews on this site or some place like dcresource or photographyblog.
robbo is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:59 AM.