Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > What Camera Should I Buy?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 12, 2012, 4:01 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 146
Default

Thanks but don't those cameras have smaller sensors, thus worst low light performace?
marubex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 12, 2012, 8:16 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
shoturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348
Default

Yup they are smaller sensor the fuji is 2/3 and the nikon is their own 2.5 crop.
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13, 2012, 9:49 AM   #13
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 146
Default

Thanks.... What I have trouble understanding is what would show better results: Sony nex5n with lens aperture 3.5 or 2.8 at most or panasonic GX1 with lens aperture 1.7-1.4?
Its so confusing... Really need help with this one..
marubex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13, 2012, 10:01 AM   #14
Super Moderator
 
peripatetic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,599
Default

Well first of all - where are you going to find a Panasonic lens with 1.4 aperture?

According to this:

http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/Cam.../(brand3)/Sony

The GX1 has maybe 1/2 stop advantage over the Nikon V1, and the NEX5N has half a stop over the GX1.

So if you are talking 2 stops difference in the lenses then the GX1 is a better choice in low light. However, a lot depends on the lenses, and how much you will be shooting in low light. And how much you like actually using the cameras.

I would suggest the m4/3 because of their excellent lens selection. The NEX has a bunch of horrible lenses, with only a couple of good ones and maybe one excellent one made by Zeiss (very expensive).

The V1 looks very nice up to ISO800, the GX1 to 1600, and the NEX to 3200. Look at the lens selection and I think the GX1 comes out the clear favourite there.
__________________
My gallery
My X100 blog
peripatetic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13, 2012, 10:17 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 146
Default

Thanks... Peripatetic, I guess that was the kind of answer I needed to understand...
Answering your question, was thinking about the panasonic-leica 25mmf1.4
Thanks
marubex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13, 2012, 12:17 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
shoturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348
Default

The 1.4, 1.7 lens and the 1.8 lenses for m4/3 do not have stabilization on the panny body, the nex 2.8 does so that gives it a little advantage in low light static shots. The stabilization gives the next a 3 stop advantage only on static shots. So you can shot the sony at 2.8, at 1600 iso at 1/30 sec and it will be nicer then the panny at 1.8 at 1600 iso at 1/15.

Now if you bring a ibis olympus into the the fray, it is a little different story with noise on static shots with fast primes.
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.

Last edited by shoturtle; May 15, 2012 at 12:45 PM.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13, 2012, 12:53 PM   #17
Super Moderator
 
peripatetic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 3,599
Default

I would seriously look at the Olympus bodies just for the IS.
__________________
My gallery
My X100 blog
peripatetic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13, 2012, 2:06 PM   #18
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 146
Default

Thanks.
Shoturtle, what do you mean about different story with noise on static.... With Olympus...
Peripatetic I had counted Olympus out because I had read they have worst high iso noise than Panny newer sensors (except EM-5, but that would take me some time to save up)... Or would the IBIS counteract some of the high iso problem??!
marubex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 13, 2012, 2:29 PM   #19
Senior Member
 
shoturtle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Frankfurt AM
Posts: 11,348
Default

You can shoot at shower shutter speed, and used say 800iso instead of 3200 and 6400. So the same shot will be clearer without camera shack with the IS ability of the nex or Olympus over the panny.
__________________
Super Frequent Flyer, no joke. Ex Patriot and loving it.
Canon Eos 60D, T1i/500D, Eos1, Eos 630, Olympus EPL-1, and a part time Pentax K-X shooter.
shoturtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2012, 2:31 AM   #20
Senior Member
 
wave01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: North West England
Posts: 1,748
Default

hi is it a case that the T2i needs a better strap to carry it with, then the problem is solved. I am going for a black rapid
wave01 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 5:03 PM.