Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > What Camera Should I Buy?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jan 20, 2006, 11:05 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 10
Default

Hello, I take 1000's of Macro photos a year, for my online vintage advertisng business, (mostly old keychains, metal pins,coasters etc).

I am searching for a camera that can serve well those needs, but also that has more flexible cababilities.. ex. for detailed complimentary shots for my larger vintage enamel signs, antiques,etc.

I need very detailed photos, without having too sharp an image, (which scares me from the Cannon..) something that won't pick up &magnify the tiny imperfections from myvintage items,that are barely or notnoticable when veiwing the item in hand, with the naked eye.

I am seriously looking at the Kodak P850 or P880, also am researching the Cannon S2 & the FujiFilm, & small Sony, which also apparantly specialize in Macros.

My problem is, that I really like Kodak colors,and theirhistoric reputaion, Iwant to upgrade from the more limited, compact digicams, & want the camera to grow with me.

I have had much success for 3 yrs,with my cheap (don't laugh..) Kodak DC 3800. (Still working the same now,as theday I bought it..)

Although my DC3800has many bad reviews over Macros& any pics taken in indoor light situations are horrible. But, If I can get my subject outdoors in sunlight I haveacheive phenominal results just with auto settings.

(I have included an example below,from myold kodak DC3800, of the back vintage paper label, of a tiny (about 1-1/4" by 1/2") Kleenex tissue box keychain. Photo was taken about 7-12" away from subject.

I have many more examples in my online store, (on the most famous worldwide auction website), don't think I can mention their name here.. but seller name is: [highlight= #ffff88]Collectorsnest if you want to see them.

Unfortunately, We rarely have good sun in Holland so I have to race outside every moment the sun does break through a cloud to take my inventory photos.

Does the P850 really not take better quality macros than my old 2 mgpxl Kodak?

Isit in confusion after researching thisfor 2 months..

I don't want to purchase another camera until this future purchase literally falls apart, and I hope that will be at least another 4 or 5 years.

I am not a camera whiz.. and am still learning terms, abbreviations,and what the manual settings will do. (But I am learning

Please anyone who can help me make this important purchase decision, I will greatly appreciate it..

Meg from South Holland, Netherlands


collectorsnest is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jan 20, 2006, 12:56 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
mtclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
Default

collectorsnest-

I can surely understand the problems that you present. I own the P-850 and it is not a very good Macro/Close-up camera. If you wanted to stay with Kodak Colors, take a look at the Kodak V-530 or the V-570 cameras. You can save some money and the image quality is much better.

The Kodak V-series cameras can get as close as about 2 inches. If you wanted to get closer, you might want to consider the Canon S-2.

Here is a sample photo of about half of a standard beer coaster taken with the V-570.

MT
Attached Images
 
mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2006, 2:53 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
mtclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
Default

This sample photo was taken with the Fuji E-900 and it is a 100% crop of the macro of the same bar coaster.

MT
Attached Images
 
mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2006, 4:46 PM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 10
Default

Thank you MT for your reply.. I thought I had included a photo from my old kodak DC 3800... but I dont see it so I will post it now.

I do not need so much to get so close to my subject, the camera mentioned above doesnt have to be very close to take clear shots.

And I have no need to shoot the microsopic hairs, on a misquito's chin, or anything like that.

its morea low light problem with my old camera, getting indoor shots andwith getting the miniture labels and print writing to show clearly..

*and also not too sharp as to magnify theminiscule imperfections that may be present, on vintage items thatare 40 or more years old..)

I want to portray my items in a clear andhonest, but complimentary way.

Maybe some subject examples will help..

Iguessmaybe I should go with another compact kodak like my DC3800or the sony cybershot,only this time make sure they dowell with low light macros..

but I was reallywishing to get something that would be a bit more flexible to use on vacation, mini movies or to just be creative with in my spare timeand such.

I am looking for something that can grow with me asmyknowledge grows, and won't have to be replaced in a year or two, because I am still longingfor somethingmore substantial.

Hereis a picture and another one to follow.These should show you exactly what my macro needs are.. And thanks again for taking the time to try & help mework this out.

Meg
Attached Images
 
collectorsnest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2006, 4:48 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 10
Default

As you can see.. the keychain is quite small.. but the reverse side of the label is the best part. It has a miniscule accurate map of spain on the back, which would be fantastic if I could get a clear shot of...

This is the best I could get with my old kodak..
Attached Images
 
collectorsnest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 20, 2006, 8:03 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
mtclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
Default

Collectorsnest-

Photos such as the two that you posted can easily and more sharply be taken using the new Kodak V-570. The V-570 is also a camera you can use as ageneral use, every day camera. If the cost of V-570 is too high. Take a look at the Kodak V-530.

MT
mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2006, 8:57 AM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 10
Default

Thank you MT.. I have looked at the kodak V570 and it looks nearly perfect, but I have arthritis, and with myoldereyesand it is sosmall, the buttons look like I wouldhave some troubles with operating.

I am still looking at the kodak DX6490 which is a bigger camera.. and has very good reviews over macro shots, though I am still not sure what it is capable on in low light situations.

I also looked at many Fuji& some of the newer Cannon IScameras.

I still don't see something in the 4-6 mgpxl range, with an exceptional lens, (Iam discovering that the lens may make most all the difference when taking clear but not too radically sharp macros..)

Irarely print photos, so I really don't see a need for too many mgpixels, think it just eats yourbattery withmore thanI need..

If only that kodak V570 wasn't sooo compact....


collectorsnest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2006, 9:53 AM   #8
Senior Member
 
mtclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
Default

Well the Kodak DX-6490 is an excellent camera as well. So perhaps that is the perfect "fit" for you.

MT
mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2006, 4:34 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
fofa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 547
Default

Don't know if it is what you are really looking for, but I did this real quick like with my Fuji S5200 (S5600 in Europe). This shows the setup, my daughters rubber stamp on a coffee jar under a 60 Watt incondescent light (above the table). I put a pen on top for percpective of size. I shot in Natural Light mode (Macro) about 10 inches away (give or take) hand held.

Attached Images
 
fofa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2006, 4:36 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
fofa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 547
Default

I cropped down to the part we are concerned with, nothing else. Although my camera is a 5 MP I shot this on 3 MP (cause that was what it was set too). Natural Light mode does not use a flash, this was just using the available light, in totally auto mode (no manual adjustments). Any way figured I would give you something to work with.

Attached Images
 
fofa is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 AM.