Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > What Camera Should I Buy?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Apr 14, 2006, 1:39 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
kezs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 139
Default

so, I'm between these two. I currently have a film nikon n65 with some gear - a 28-80, a tamron 70-300, a 1.4x tc, sb-27 speedlight, su-4 remote speedlight trigger, but I can sell most of it for a decent price here in brazil.

so I'm kinda stuck. oly offers great lenses (14-45 and 40-150) for the price I'd get the d50 plus a 18-70 (the 18-55 that comes with the d50 seems lousy). oly has 8mp and a self-cleaning sensor to avoid dust. nikon has the brand name, accessories... good performance at high iso. I'd get 630mm equivalent with the d50 and what I have...

I don't know. I know I can't really go wrong with either... but I still have to pick one. any hints? :?

edit: oh, and one more thing: has anyone here had the experience of buying refurbs?

kezs is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Apr 14, 2006, 2:09 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
mtclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
Default

kezs-

I can probably give you a unique viewpoint. I am a Digital Photography Instructor for our state university and I own both the Olympus E-500 and the Nikon D-50. Owning two DSLR bodies is very convenient. I keep the Zukio 14-54 lens on my E-500 most of the time and basically use it for shots below ISO 400 and for macros. I also own and very much like the 40-150mm lens as well.

In contrast, I use the D-50 for high ISO shots and and long zoom shots. I have a Sigma 30mm F1.4 lensthat I use on the D-50 doing ISO 1600 shot with great images. That is something that would be out of the question for the E-500.

IMHO, and based on a single camera philosophy, I think that the D-50 will give you a much wider variety of shots.

MT
mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2006, 3:25 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
kezs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 139
Default

mtclimber,

that's a pleasant coincidence. thanks for your insight.

how useful is the self-cleaning thingie on the e500? and do you occasionally miss the extra 2mp when you're using the nikon? what about the lcd on the oly, is it much better?

those are the main advantages of the e500 over the d50... :|
kezs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2006, 3:32 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
mtclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
Default

kezs-

Yes, the ultra super sonic wave guide cleaner on the E-500 reduces cleaning by 20 to 30% but it does not eliminate it. But please keep in mind that I also change lenses quite often when producing teaching materials.

No, there is not a huge difference between the 6mp and the 8mp images. I staged a sample photo for you. Here is a 100% crop of an image taken with the D-50 using my Sigma 30mm F1.4 lens. It was handheld at taken at ISO 800 in our living room.




Attached Images
 
mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2006, 3:40 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
kezs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 139
Default

handheld, 100% crop, iso 800? that's impressive! :O

and much of the extra pixels on the e500 are due to the 4:3 ratio, so there isn't a huge difference in the horizontal pixel count.

thanks, mate. I'm strongly leaning towards the d50 right now...
kezs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2006, 5:24 PM   #6
Senior Member
 
algold's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Israel
Posts: 369
Default

mtclimber wrote:
Quote:
...Here is a 100% crop of an image taken with the D-50 using my Sigma 30mm F1.4 lens. It was handheld at taken at ISO 800 in our living room.
MT, D50 is a great camera, but the EXIF info for your image shows:

shutter priority, 1/500", F1.4, ISO 200 and the flash was fired - with these settings it's not a problem to take a handheld shot. Probably, you've just posted the wrong image.

Yours, Alex


algold is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2006, 9:08 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
mtclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
Default

You are entirely correct Algold, I posted the wrong photo. I apologize. I was in a hurry to leave to teach a class, andI simply rushed too much. Here you go.

MT


Attached Images
 
mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2006, 10:32 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
kezs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 139
Default

yeah, I was wondering how a 100% crop could be wide like that. still, really impressive!

I wonder how good the kit 18-55 is...
kezs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2006, 10:45 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
mtclimber's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Oregon, USA
Posts: 18,143
Default

Luckily I still had some Nikon lenses, so I just bought the body only. I have never used the Nikkor 18-55mm lens. Instead, I have a Nikkor 18-70mm lens that was the kit lens for my D-70 before I sold the body. The last sample was done with the Sigma 30mm F 1.4 lens that just arrived today.

MT
mtclimber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2006, 11:03 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
kezs's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 139
Default

my first thought is to get the d50 plus the 18-70... but that's selling for like 330 bucks, whereas the 18-55 comes for an extra 100 on the kit. oh decisions, decisions
kezs is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:34 AM.