Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > What Camera Should I Buy?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jun 8, 2006, 9:04 AM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2
Default

Hello everybody,

I'm looking for a good camera for taking amateur pictures. Image Stabilisation and high ISO rates seem the solution for my annoyence with blurry (evening)pictures... Furthermore, I'd like the possibility to shoot in macro-mode.

However, I can't seem to make a choice between the Olympus Stylus 810 and the Canon DS700 IS...

These are the main differences..:

Megapixels: Canon 6 vs. Olympus 8
Iso: Canon 80 - 800 vs. Olympus 64 - 3200 (however noisy)
Macro: Canon 2 cm vs. Olympus 10 cm.
Optical Zoom: Canon 4x vs. Olympus 3x.
Optical viewer: Canon yes, Olympus no.

Furthermore, I read the LCD on the Olympus has Brightview technology but is so shiny, you can't see clearly when it's sunny. Rather annoying while there's no optical viewer.
The Canon is much more expensive and had less megapixels.

Another difference... The Olympus has DIGITAL image stabilisation, while the Canon has OPTICAL image stabilisation...

I like the exterior of the Olympus better, but of course it's the specifications that are the most important here...

Can someone help me out here, making this difficult choice...?

:sad:


Kiwi84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jun 8, 2006, 11:23 AM   #2
E.T
Senior Member
 
E.T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 921
Default

As general rule difference in megapixels is completely irrevelant when you go over 5MP unless you make really big prints.

Kiwi84 wrote:
Quote:
Iso: Canon 80 - 800 vs. Olympus 64 - 3200 (however noisy)
That 3200 is downsized 3MP image and 1600 has lot of chroma (colour) noise, cleaning that is possible but it removes details. 800 looks quite decent and 400 is good.

Quote:
Another difference... The Olympus has DIGITAL image stabilisation, while the Canon has OPTICAL image stabilisation...
"Digital" stabilization is pure fraud like digital zoom. It only cranks up ISO.
Also lack of viewfinder makes camera shaking prone because of shooting position which amplifies handshake.
(hands more or less straight instead of supporting camera also to forehead)

So for stationary targets (landscapes, architecture...) Canon would be much better because optical viewfinder allows less shake prone shooting position and stabilization helps further.
For moving targets higher ISO is of course better because long shutter times aren't possbile so what kind low light shots you would need to take?
E.T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 8, 2006, 3:49 PM   #3
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 2
Default

Thanks for your help so far!

I'm often taking pictures in the evening or at night, and I took many photo's (for instance with a Samsung camera I'm not so fond about) with flash that looked awful, everything looked very 'lighted'. The colours look different and the whole atmosphere of the moment is gone.
So for that reason I would like a camera that can take better photo's at night, possibly without flash, or with a 'good' flash, that keeps teh scene intact

I thought the Olympus would be better for this because it has 'brightview' technology, and higher possible ISO rates. But if brightview just means IS, and IS in this case just means higher (noisy or 3MP) ISO rates.... :?

I also saw some sample pics of the DS700 that were so called 'soft'. I read people were not really enthousiastic about the quality of the pictures...
Kiwi84 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:58 AM.