Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Digicam Help > What Camera Should I Buy?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Jun 20, 2006, 11:11 PM   #1
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6
Default

I want a 12x zoom camera that would take decent short video as well. Reviews indicate that the Canon S2 IS does this very well. How about the Kodak P850, the Panasonic FZ3, FZ5, or F27, or the Sony H2?
joejany is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Jun 26, 2006, 12:35 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
rfortson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 349
Default

I own the Canon S1 IS and the Kodak P850. I can't comment on the others. One of the features I wanted in my camerawas good video. I think the Canon S1 has a little better video than the Kodak simply because it's slightly less compressed. However, the P850 video is still good. I believe the Canon S2 has the same general video that the S1 has, so you shouldn't be dissappointed.

One plus about the Kodak video being a little more compressed is that you don't need a high-speed card to capture it like you do with the Canons, so you can use cheaper cards that are easier to find. The Canon requires high speed cards or it will stop capturing once the buffer fills up. Whichever camera you pick, make sure of the write speed of the cards you'll need with it or you may run into problems with video capture.

Also, format of the video is something to consider. The Kodak uses a Quicktime format (which I don't really like), but I can edit it with Adobe Premiere Elements, so it was okay. The Canon saved it in an AVI file that could be edited with Windows Movie Maker (included free with Windows XP). Whatever the format you choose, you'll need some software to edit it.

Good luck!

Russ
rfortson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26, 2006, 3:04 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Indian Rocks Beach, FL
Posts: 4,036
Default

The S2 has wind buffered stereo mics. I'm not sure stereo sound is that big a deal to most people, but wind noise can be a nuisance.


slipe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 26, 2006, 6:44 PM   #4
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8
Default

I don't know about the S2, but what I've been reading about the S3 indicates that the highest quality settings eat up about 2 mb per second, and if that's the case with the S2, you might want to consider that if you are going to be shooting large amounts of video.

Also, the newer Kodaks, (the V610, Z612, and the forthcoming p712), are supposed to feature MPEG recording, and at least the Z612 also features stereo mics, although it also reportedly creates noise when the zoom is being used in movie mode.
Clashman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 29, 2006, 9:36 PM   #5
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6
Default

Thanks for the advice
joejany is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 29, 2006, 9:37 PM   #6
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 6
Default

My main aim is to shoot pictures of people skiing. As long as the wind doesn't drown out my comments, I can live with it.
joejany is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jun 30, 2006, 4:59 AM   #7
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 8
Default

If you are going to be doing sports, the Canon is probably your best bet. I've seen it reported in a few places that the Kodak loses focus when zooming, and if you are going for sports, that could be a problem. The only problem with the Canon is that it eats space like no tomorrow. Around 2mb/sec at high quality settings. The Sony H2 is supposed to be decent as well, although that requires Memory Stick Duo for the highest settings.
Clashman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2006, 2:06 AM   #8
Member
 
DigitalNewbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 69
Default

Clashman wrote:
Quote:
<snip> The only problem with the Canon is that it eats space like no tomorrow. Around 2mb/sec at high quality settings. <snip>
The Canon S2is DOES consume a lot of memory for movies, but it does a good job, and has excellent stereo sound. Maximum movie length is 1GB, which is just under 8 minutes at max. resolution (640x480 @ 30fps). Maximum time is over an hour (just under 72 minutes) at minimum resolution (320x240 @ 15fps). Runtime can be increased slightly by lowering audio quality. Here are the times for my specific memory cards:

http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a3...gOh/SDCard.jpg

On my S2 IS, only my hi-speed cards (512MB SanDisk ultra II and 256MB Transcend 80x) can shoot movies at 640x480 30fps until the card is full, but even my slower cards can do so at 640x480 15fps. Likewise, my slower cards display the 'buffer warning' icon after a dozen (?) or so shots in hi-speed burst mode, but my hi-speed cards cards can shoot in HSBM until they're full.
DigitalNewbie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2006, 2:16 AM   #9
Member
 
DigitalNewbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 69
Default

DigitalNewbie wrote:
Quote:
Quote:
<snip> Maximum time is over an hour (just under 72 minutes) at minimum resolution (320x240 @ 15fps). <snip>

OOPS! :?Cut that in half -- I meant to say just under 36 minutes at min rez. Sorry!
DigitalNewbie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Jul 2, 2006, 10:05 AM   #10
Senior Member
 
zygh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 531
Default

joejany, you may know it already but there is no dSLR that has movie capability. And besides, none of the cams you quoted above are dSLRs anyway... :?
zygh is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 7:50 AM.