Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Post Your Photos > Wildlife Photos

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Sep 26, 2003, 8:35 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,803
Default Finally got a good one

I've had to ask for some help with flash usage. You see, I've had trouble getting a good picture of this Green Heron. I've seen him 3 days over the past week. Well, I went out again today (bad knee and all) determined to use what NHL and tuanokc told me about proper flash usage. Here is a good example of the results:



Camera: 10D 100-400 @ 400mm, ISO 100, -1/2 flash comp, 1/200, f8
Photoshop: Levels, contrast, resize, sharpen.

I've been using the new flash (550EX) but I've been fairly unhappy with the results. First it was my fault (thanks guys!) but once I got beyond that I was finding the results to be a bit too flat and a bit to bright. So while shooting today I taught myself how to use flash compensation and experimented with that (hate it when you forget the manual!)

Believe it or not, this is a full frame picture. Yes, I was that close. I have some more pictures I'll turn into a gallery on my web site. Probably over the weekend. My knee is killing me so I have to stop shooting for awhile.

I'll take any and all comments. I'm generally happy with how this came out. Wish the bird wasn't sitting on concrete, but you can't get everything!

Eric
eric s is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Old Sep 26, 2003, 8:38 PM   #2
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 19
Default

Awesome shot! I love the detail and colour. I'll be sure to check out your gallery.

Jay
chubby is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 26, 2003, 10:12 PM   #3
djb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Posts: 2,289
Default

excellent!!!

dennis
djb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2003, 10:16 AM   #4
NHL
Senior Member
 
NHL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 39.18776, -77.311353333333
Posts: 11,547
Default

Eric

Good shot! Now you're ready for the wireless feature.

... Use a 2nd unit on the other side to get rid of the shadow. Sigma makes a clone @ 1/2 the cost unless of course you're an all out Canon man. :P
NHL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2003, 11:16 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,803
Default

I'm not, I only got the (overpriced!) 550EX because of its power and compatability. I didn't feel I knew enough to use a flash which had compatability problems/quirks as well.

Going with a second flash is an interesting idea. I'm also thinking of getting something to raise the flash even higher over the camera. I was getting "red-eye" on the Green Heron even with that flash. That is why I chose that picture... didn't have to try to fix the eyes in PS.

Does anyone find the picture a little flat? Maybe it's the nature of the features... so smooth to the bird. But something seems just a bit wrong with the picture. I was blaming the use of flash, but maybe I shouldn't?

Eric
eric s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2003, 12:01 PM   #6
NHL
Senior Member
 
NHL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 39.18776, -77.311353333333
Posts: 11,547
Default

Quote:
Does anyone find the picture a little flat?
Using an even slower shutter speed might help you balanced in more background.
NHL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2003, 3:10 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,803
Default

I agree that having a background would be nice. But I don't believe I was on a tripod for that shot (I did some both on and off.) Off the tripod at 400mm a less than 1/200... scares me.

Eric

ps. Now that I think about it... I might have been on the tripod. Humm....
eric s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 28, 2003, 5:57 AM   #8
NHL
Senior Member
 
NHL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: 39.18776, -77.311353333333
Posts: 11,547
Default

That piece of concrete/background won't be moving... even @ 1/60s

Remember if the leafy background moves your main subject is already frozen by the much faster flash pulse, and would actually makes it acts more like a shallow DOF (ie blurry background). The 1/200s shutter is not what freezed the bird here! :P
NHL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 28, 2003, 8:48 AM   #9
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,803
Default

The longer the shutter the more ambient light is coming into the camera. The "as metered" settings were around... 1/60 at f5.6 or so. If I shot at 1/120 at f8 (or so) that would be 2 stops of what it should be (1 for the shutter, 1 for the aperture). I would have thought that would be enough to allow a slight ghosting effect on everything (motion blur.)

Of course, I have no idea if that is true... but its what I imagined. I guess I could go try it in my closet! (I have some really boring pictures of my dress shirts....)

Another interesting question is about the aperture. I tried to shoot at f11 (? 1 stop beyond f8) and it came out really dark. This is a really powerful flash, but I guess I don't know how many stops it gives you back. I was off by about.... 4'ish stops with 1/200 f11. I thought the flash was powerful enough for that, but maybe not? How do you make such a calculation?

Eric
eric s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 28, 2003, 12:41 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
Klaus DK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 2,216
Default

Really nice shot. Good work Eric!
Klaus DK is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:42 PM.