Go Back   Steve's Digicams Forums > Post Your Photos > Wildlife Photos

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old Apr 10, 2006, 6:53 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 384
Default

Thanks much for the comments everyone. I appreciate them all. I actually drug (dragged?) out an old monopod that I will attempt to use with the Bigma. I was pricing some when I remembered I had one stuffed in a closet. If it can handle the Bigma I'll use it...if not I'll have to ask my lovely wife if I can buy a bigger one. Woody
woodysworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12, 2006, 8:19 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
ruchai's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 287
Default

squirl033 wrote:
Quote:
i seriously considered the Bigma, just for the extra 100mm of reach... on my 30D, that would translate to an 800mm equivalent lens. but the Bigma isn't stabilized, and the EX 80-400 is, so i opted for that one instead. it's only marginally smaller - 12" extended, or 16" with the hood, but i can hand-hold it at full zoom and get clear shots, thanks to the stabilization. and since shooting birds in flight from a tripod usually doesn't work well, i wanted something i could shoot by hand and get decent shots.
I was also considered between the bigma and 80-400VR and decided on the 80-400. I think be able to hand hold the camera is an advantage over 100 mm extra focal length. Chances for taking flying birds is dim with lens on tripod. I had more than 8,000 bird pictures with my Nikkor 80-400VR, thanks to my decision to buy the 80-44.
Attached Images
 
ruchai is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 7:23 AM.